Should be able to use backticks instead of underscore for "type" args

[wagenet]

RBS generation: 'type' is a keyword in RBS, renaming method parameter to '_type'

I believe that instead of renaming to _type you can wrap it in backticks.

[AaronC81]

Ah, so you can - thanks!

Something I noticed while experimenting, though, is that I can't get any parse errors to trigger when methods contain keywords even without backticks:

$ cat test.rbs
───────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
       │ File: test.rbs
───────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
   1   │ class Foo
   2   │   def def: (void: String, class: Integer) -> void
   3   │ end 
───────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

$ rbs -I . method Foo def
::Foo#def
  defined_in: ::Foo
  implementation: ::Foo
  accessibility: public
  types:
      (void: ::String, class: ::Integer) -> void

I wonder if the parser has been made more permissive since I added this keyword check?

[wagenet]

That's possible. I noticed the backtick usage in typeprof.