Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Running time 4 times slower than SENet #3

Open
xwang-icsi opened this issue Jul 29, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Running time 4 times slower than SENet #3

xwang-icsi opened this issue Jul 29, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@xwang-icsi
Copy link

Thank you for your re-implementation of GENet, when I was trying to run GENet with Theta-minus, the parameter free version, it seems like the running time will be about 4 times slower than the SENet counterpart, I found that F.interpolate is the main reason for slowing down the running process, not sure whether you can get close running time?

@ma-xu
Copy link

ma-xu commented Sep 12, 2019

pytorch/pytorch#12409 (comment)

@ma-xu
Copy link

ma-xu commented Sep 13, 2019

Thank you for your re-implementation of GENet, when I was trying to run GENet with Theta-minus, the parameter free version, it seems like the running time will be about 4 times slower than the SENet counterpart, I found that F.interpolate is the main reason for slowing down the running process, not sure whether you can get close running time?

It's east to solve this problem, u just need to update your pytorch 1.1 to pytorch 1.2.0. The issue is addressed in 1.2 version.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants