You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a content author/editor, I want a clear and standardized way to choose the styling of buttons across all blocks and pages.
Description
The current implementation of blocks has button styling defined by the order buttons are placed, i.e. when there are 2 buttons one below the other, the 2nd one is treated as a secondary button.
This implementation needs to be changed to align with the OOTB Franklin behavior, where variations of buttons are defined by the emphasis of the text in the Word document (e.g. bold or italic).
Acceptance Criteria
Button styling is dictated by the emphasis of the text in the Word document (e.g. bold, italic, underline, etc.) rather than the placement of the buttons.
We cannot deliver this button. After further investigation on Mack trucks delivery, we consider that due to the personalization of the buttons, editing the behavior may bring some issues. Therefore, I will put it to the backlog until we can pick it up again.
This ticket is on hold until the end of the redesign due to code changes needed for the button that would conflict with the changes needed for redesign.
Business value
As a content author/editor, I want a clear and standardized way to choose the styling of buttons across all blocks and pages.
Description
The current implementation of blocks has button styling defined by the order buttons are placed, i.e. when there are 2 buttons one below the other, the 2nd one is treated as a secondary button.
This implementation needs to be changed to align with the OOTB Franklin behavior, where variations of buttons are defined by the emphasis of the text in the Word document (e.g. bold or italic).
Acceptance Criteria
Notes
Franklin OOTB Buttons docs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: