You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been setting up auth for my server using servant-auth and servant-auth-server I've run into a few different issues, first for a bit of context:
We're using JWT access tokens for our authentication, the tokens contain only a signed user ID which we then use to look up the user attributes in a DB
We don't really have any use for cookie auth or sessions at the moment.
Pursuing this goal, I added the following type:
dataAccessTokenClaims=AccessTokenClaims{userID::UserId,
scope::Scopes}instanceFromJWTAccessTokenClaimswheredecodeJWT::ClaimsSet->EitherTextAccessTokenClaims
decodeJWT claims =do
userID <- fromMaybe (Left"Invalid sub") (claims ^? claimSub . _Just .JWT.string . to IDs.fromText)
pure (AccessTokenClaims {..})
where
resultEither =\caseAeson.Error err ->Left (Text.pack err)
Aeson.Success a ->Right a
Now I use Auth '[JWT] AccessTokenClaims in my API routes, but my call to hoistServerWithContext complains:
• No instance for (HasContextEntry '[] CookieSettings)
arising from a use of ‘hoistServerWithContext’
Which is strange because I'm not reading or setting cookies anywhere, nor do I intend to.
I've read elsewhere that servant-auth sets session cookies for all users regardless of whether you want it to, and as a result ALSO requires a ToJWT instance on anything that Auth returns. This is at worst an annoyance for AccessTokenClaims, but I proceeded to add a custom combinator which reads and validates the jwt, and then loads the user from our DB:
The idea here is to allow loading the authenticated user for all requests which need it.
However once again I'm told that I need ToJWT for User, which implies that Auth wants to save User in a session cookie. I don't want the User to be saved in a session cookie, not only is it potentially large, but it may hold sensitive information that shouldn't leave the server.
It seems like this isn't how Auth is intended to be used, but simultaneously seems like the most sensible way to load an authenticated user safely.
I suspect I could write my own combinator to do this which circumvents servant-auth entirely, or I can just load the user inside every endpoint which requires it; but figured I'd ask whether this is something servant-auth supports somehow first.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To be clear, I do think it is a design wart: the instance should be independent on the authentication scheme. There is a draft PR that intends to solve this problem:
Hi all 👋🏼
I've been setting up auth for my server using
servant-auth
andservant-auth-server
I've run into a few different issues, first for a bit of context:Pursuing this goal, I added the following type:
Now I use
Auth '[JWT] AccessTokenClaims
in my API routes, but my call tohoistServerWithContext
complains:Which is strange because I'm not reading or setting cookies anywhere, nor do I intend to.
I've read elsewhere that
servant-auth
sets session cookies for all users regardless of whether you want it to, and as a result ALSO requires aToJWT
instance on anything thatAuth
returns. This is at worst an annoyance forAccessTokenClaims
, but I proceeded to add a custom combinator which reads and validates the jwt, and then loads the user from our DB:The idea here is to allow loading the authenticated user for all requests which need it.
However once again I'm told that I need
ToJWT
forUser
, which implies that Auth wants to saveUser
in a session cookie. I don't want the User to be saved in a session cookie, not only is it potentially large, but it may hold sensitive information that shouldn't leave the server.It seems like this isn't how Auth is intended to be used, but simultaneously seems like the most sensible way to load an authenticated user safely.
I suspect I could write my own combinator to do this which circumvents
servant-auth
entirely, or I can just load the user inside every endpoint which requires it; but figured I'd ask whether this is something servant-auth supports somehow first.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: