-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathlibrary.bib
4419 lines (4053 loc) · 298 KB
/
library.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
@online{2010,
abstract = {This series of articles is part of my learning experience and intended to give you a practical tour of how a PDF document~works. I’m going to start by giving a brief description of what eleme…},
date = {2010-09-08T11:54:11+00:00},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/3VBZVVMQ/grow-your-own-pdf-file-part-1-pdf-objects-and-data-types.html},
journaltitle = {Java PDF Blog},
langid = {american},
shorttitle = {Make Your Own {{PDF}} File – 1},
title = {Make Your Own {{PDF}} File – 1: {{PDF Objects}} and {{Data Types}}},
url = {https://blog.idrsolutions.com/2010/09/grow-your-own-pdf-file-part-1-pdf-objects-and-data-types/},
urldate = {2019-10-25}
}
@online{2017,
abstract = {Explains how to disable ssh password login (authentication) on a Linux operating system and only allow login using ssh public keys for security purposes.},
date = {2017-02-17T19:18:42+00:00},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/68FGH2PI/how-to-disable-ssh-password-login-on-linux.html},
journaltitle = {nixCraft},
langid = {american},
title = {How to Disable Ssh Password Login on {{Linux}} to Increase Security},
url = {https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/how-to-disable-ssh-password-login-on-linux/},
urldate = {2019-09-26}
}
@inreference{2018,
abstract = {The Rømer scale (Danish pronunciation: [ˈʁœːˀmɐ]; notated as °Rø), also known as Romer or Roemer, is a temperature scale named after the Danish astronomer Ole Christensen Rømer, who proposed it in 1701. It is based on the freezing point of pure water being 7.5 degrees and the boiling point of water as 60 degrees.},
booktitle = {Wikipedia},
date = {2018-11-30T22:59:06Z},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/9NACULX4/index.html},
langid = {english},
note = {Page Version ID: 871419583},
title = {Rømer Scale},
url = {https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=R%C3%B8mer_scale&oldid=871419583},
urldate = {2019-04-03}
}
@inreference{2019,
abstract = {A thermoscope is a device that shows changes in temperature. A typical design is a tube in which a liquid rises and falls as the temperature changes. The modern thermometer gradually evolved from it with the addition of a scale in the early 17th century and standardisation through the 17th and 18th centuries.},
booktitle = {Wikipedia},
date = {2019-02-05T22:06:48Z},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/WJ2FUDX3/index.html},
langid = {english},
note = {Page Version ID: 881955489},
title = {Thermoscope},
url = {https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thermoscope&oldid=881955489},
urldate = {2019-04-03}
}
@inreference{2019a,
abstract = {Galileo Galilei (Italian: [ɡaliˈlɛːo ɡaliˈlɛi]; 15 February 1564 – 8 January 1642) was an Italian astronomer, physicist and engineer, sometimes described as a polymath. Galileo has been called the "father of observational astronomy", the "father of modern physics", the "father of the scientific method", and the "father of modern science".Galileo studied speed and velocity, gravity and free fall, the principle of relativity, inertia, projectile motion and also worked in applied science and technology, describing the properties of pendulums and "hydrostatic balances", inventing the thermoscope and various military compasses, and using the telescope for scientific observations of celestial objects. His contributions to observational astronomy include the telescopic confirmation of the phases of Venus, the observation of the four largest satellites of Jupiter, the observation of Saturn and the analysis of sunspots.
Galileo's championing of heliocentrism and Copernicanism was controversial during his lifetime, when most subscribed to geocentric models such as the Tychonic system. He met with opposition from astronomers, who doubted heliocentrism because of the absence of an observed stellar parallax. The matter was investigated by the Roman Inquisition in 1615, which concluded that heliocentrism was "foolish and absurd in philosophy, and formally heretical since it explicitly contradicts in many places the sense of Holy Scripture". Galileo later defended his views in Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems (1632), which appeared to attack Pope Urban VIII and thus alienated him and the Jesuits, who had both supported Galileo up until this point. He was tried by the Inquisition, found "vehemently suspect of heresy", and forced to recant. He spent the rest of his life under house arrest. While under house arrest, he wrote Two New Sciences, in which he summarized work he had done some forty years earlier on the two sciences now called kinematics and strength of materials.},
booktitle = {Wikipedia},
date = {2019-03-18T06:29:51Z},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/9LESCWF5/index.html},
langid = {english},
note = {Page Version ID: 888296270},
title = {Galileo {{Galilei}}},
url = {https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Galileo_Galilei&oldid=888296270},
urldate = {2019-04-03}
}
@inreference{2019b,
abstract = {Lord of the Flies is a 1954 novel by Nobel Prize–winning British author William Golding. The book focuses on a group of British boys stranded on an uninhabited island and their disastrous attempt to govern themselves.
The novel has been generally well received. It was named in the Modern Library 100 Best Novels, reaching number 41 on the editor's list, and 25 on the reader's list. In 2003 it was listed at number 70 on the BBC's The Big Read poll, and in 2005 Time magazine named it as one of the 100 best English-language novels from 1923 to 2005.},
booktitle = {Wikipedia},
date = {2019-09-22T17:54:35Z},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/7M89VCZB/index.html},
langid = {english},
note = {Page Version ID: 917191094},
title = {\emph{Lord of the }{{\emph{Flies}}}},
url = {https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lord_of_the_Flies&oldid=917191094},
urldate = {2019-09-29}
}
@article{aarts2014,
abstract = {In neuroscience, experimental designs in which multiple observations are collected from a single research object (for example, multiple neurons from one animal) are common: 53\% of 314 reviewed papers from five renowned journals included this type of data. These so-called 'nested designs' yield data that cannot be considered to be independent, and so violate the independency assumption of conventional statistical methods such as the t test. Ignoring this dependency results in a probability of incorrectly concluding that an effect is statistically significant that is far higher (up to 80\%) than the nominal α level (usually set at 5\%). We discuss the factors affecting the type I error rate and the statistical power in nested data, methods that accommodate dependency between observations and ways to determine the optimal study design when data are nested. Notably, optimization of experimental designs nearly always concerns collection of more truly independent observations, rather than more observations from one research object.},
author = {Aarts, Emmeke and Verhage, Matthijs and Veenvliet, Jesse V. and Dolan, Conor V. and van der Sluis, Sophie},
date = {2014-04},
doi = {10.1038/nn.3648},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/QWJ76M8G/Aarts et al. - 2014 - A solution to dependency using multilevel analysi.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/TFLTY2KW/nn.html},
issn = {1546-1726},
journaltitle = {Nature Neuroscience},
langid = {english},
options = {useprefix=true},
pages = {491-496},
shorttitle = {A Solution to Dependency},
title = {A Solution to Dependency: Using Multilevel Analysis to Accommodate Nested Data},
volume = {17}
}
@article{aftanas2018,
abstract = {A review of the historical measurement theory literature in psychology reveals a recurring focus on a physical rather than a psychological model of the measurement process, whereas the active measurement research literature points to an emphasis on elements of a psychological measurement process. On the basis of the relevant portions of these anomalous findings the authors outline parts of a general measurement structure for psychology that begins with an essential theoretical base. The review first explores a century-old statement that developed a promising starting point within test development. This is followed by a diversionary statement based on physical measurement that mandated discussions of measurement in psychology to a physical model. The statement appeared to be countered by the theory of scale types (Stevens, 1946), which provided a promising element of the psychological measurement process. The legacy of the theory of scales, however, resulted in confusion and inconsistency about the specifics of psychological measurement. After reviewing some of the contributions in the research literature, a conciliation of the positive theory efforts of the past and the protocols for a measurement process are presented that is based upon the standard system of measurement (Aftanas, 1988, 2006) as the basic theoretically necessary element of measurement. The theoretical framework based on the standard system promises not only to integrate the components of measurement, and categories of psychological measurement that have been referenced in the past, but also to provide an easily assimilated protocol that can serve as a basis for future research and pedagogical exposition.},
author = {Aftanas, Marion S. and Solomon, Joanna},
date = {2018-09},
doi = {10.1037/gpr0000143},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/JUZJQHQC/Aftanas and Solomon - 2018 - Historical traces of a general measurement theory .pdf},
issn = {1939-1552, 1089-2680},
journaltitle = {Review of General Psychology},
langid = {english},
number = {3},
pages = {278-289},
title = {Historical Traces of a General Measurement Theory in Psychology.},
volume = {22}
}
@article{AGPL3,
author = {{Free Software Foundation}},
date = {2007},
title = {{{GNU Affero General Public License Version}} 3 ({{AGPL}}-3.0)},
url = {https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html}
}
@article{algina2003,
author = {Algina, James and Olejnik, Stephen},
date = {2003-07},
doi = {10.1207/S15327906MBR3803_02},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/36WV7BTH/Algina and Olejnik - 2003 - Sample Size Tables for Correlation Analysis with A.pdf},
issn = {0027-3171, 1532-7906},
journaltitle = {Multivariate Behavioral Research},
langid = {english},
pages = {309-323},
title = {Sample Size Tables for Correlation Analysis with Applications in Partial Correlation and Multiple Regression Analysis},
volume = {38}
}
@article{Anderson1991,
author = {Anderson, John R and Schooler, Lael J},
date = {1991},
doi = {10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00174.x},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/9LPA8LM9/Anderson, Schooler - 1991 - Reflections of the environment in memory.pdf},
journaltitle = {Psychological Science},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper_pass},
pages = {396-408},
title = {Reflections of the Environment in Memory},
volume = {2}
}
@article{anderson2013,
abstract = {How are multiple variables integrated into a unitary response? This fundamental problem— integration of multiple variables—faces every field of psychology. Solid support for three exact mathematical integration laws—averaging, adding, multiplying— has been given by extensive empirical work by investigators in many countries. These three integration laws operate in almost every area of human psychology: person science, social attitudes, child development, learning/memory, language, psychophysics, and judgment— decision. These laws have nomothetic generality across persons and cultures together with idiographic capability for true measurement of personal, individual value. These integration laws are thus a foundation, both conceptual and empirical, for unifying psychological science.},
author = {Anderson, Norman Henry},
date = {2013},
doi = {10.1037/a0032921},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/8LLRH6LQ/Anderson - 2013 - Unified psychology based on three laws of informat.pdf},
issn = {1939-1552, 1089-2680},
journaltitle = {Review of General Psychology},
langid = {english},
number = {2},
pages = {125-132},
title = {Unified Psychology Based on Three Laws of Information Integration.},
volume = {17}
}
@article{arend2019,
abstract = {The estimation of power in two-level models used to analyze data that are hierarchically structured is particularly complex because the outcome contains variance at two levels that is regressed on predictors at two levels. Methods for the estimation of power in two-level models have been based on formulas and Monte Carlo simulation. We provide a hands-on tutorial illustrating how a priori and post hoc power analyses for the most frequently used two-level models are conducted. We describe how a population model for the power analysis can be specified by using standardized input parameters and how the power analysis is implemented in SIMR, a very flexible power estimation method based on Monte Carlo simulation. Finally, we provide case-sensitive rules of thumb for deriving sufficient sample sizes as well as minimum detectable effect sizes that yield a power ≥ .80 for the effects and input parameters most frequently analyzed by psychologists. For medium variance components, the results indicate that with lower level (L1) sample sizes up to 30 and higher level (L2) sample sizes up to 200, medium and large fixed effects can be detected. However, small L2 direct- or cross-level interaction effects cannot be detected with up to 200 clusters. The tutorial and guidelines should be of help to researchers dealing with multilevel study designs such as individuals clustered within groups or repeated measurements clustered within individuals. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved)},
author = {Arend, Matthias G. and Schäfer, Thomas},
date = {2019-02},
doi = {10.1037/met0000195},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/AIWM26XH/Arend and Schäfer - 2019 - Statistical power in two-level models A tutorial .pdf},
issn = {1082-989X},
journaltitle = {Psychological Methods},
keywords = {Estimation,hierarchical linear model (HLM),mixed effect models,multilevel modeling,Population,power analysis,Sample Size,sample size determination,Simulation,Statistical Power},
pages = {1-19},
shortjournal = {Psychological Methods},
shorttitle = {Statistical Power in Two-Level Models},
title = {Statistical Power in Two-Level Models: {{A}} Tutorial Based on {{Monte Carlo}} Simulation},
volume = {24}
}
@article{arnulf2014,
abstract = {Some disciplines in the social sciences rely heavily on collecting survey responses to detect empirical relationships among variables. We explored whether these relationships were a priori predictable from the semantic properties of the survey items, using language processing algorithms which are now available as new research methods. Language processing algorithms were used to calculate the semantic similarity among all items in state-of-the-art surveys from Organisational Behaviour research. These surveys covered areas such as transformational leadership, work motivation and work outcomes. This information was used to explain and predict the response patterns from real subjects. Semantic algorithms explained 60–86\% of the variance in the response patterns and allowed remarkably precise prediction of survey responses from humans, except in a personality test. Even the relationships between independent and their purported dependent variables were accurately predicted. This raises concern about the empirical nature of data collected through some surveys if results are already given a priori through the way subjects are being asked. Survey response patterns seem heavily determined by semantics. Language algorithms may suggest these prior to administering a survey. This study suggests that semantic algorithms are becoming new tools for the social sciences, opening perspectives on survey responses that prevalent psychometric theory cannot explain.},
author = {Arnulf, Jan Ketil and Larsen, Kai Rune and Martinsen, Øyvind Lund and Bong, Chih How},
date = {2014-09-03},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0106361},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/P2TJKMVQ/Arnulf et al. - 2014 - Predicting Survey Responses How and Why Semantics.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/VJAY42VG/article.html},
issn = {1932-6203},
journaltitle = {PLOS ONE},
keywords = {Algorithms,Behavior,Jobs,Language,Semantics,Survey research,Surveys,Vector spaces},
langid = {english},
number = {9},
pages = {e106361},
shortjournal = {PLOS ONE},
shorttitle = {Predicting {{Survey Responses}}},
title = {Predicting {{Survey Responses}}: {{How}} and {{Why Semantics Shape Survey Statistics}} on {{Organizational Behaviour}}},
volume = {9}
}
@article{arnulf2018,
abstract = {The traditional understanding of data from Likert scales is that the quantifications involved result from measures of attitude strength. Applying a recently proposed semantic theory of survey response, we claim that survey responses tap two different sources: a mixture of attitudes plus the semantic structure of the survey. Exploring the degree to which individual responses are influenced by semantics, we hypothesized that in many cases, information about attitude strength is actually filtered out as noise in the commonly used correlation matrix. We developed a procedure to separate the semantic influence from attitude strength in individual response patterns, and compared these results to, respectively, the observed sample correlation matrices and the semantic similarity structures arising from text analysis algorithms. This was done with four datasets, comprising a total of 7,787 subjects and 27,461,502 observed item pair responses. As we argued, attitude strength seemed to account for much information about the individual respondents. However, this information did not seem to carry over into the observed sample correlation matrices, which instead converged around the semantic structures offered by the survey items. This is potentially disturbing for the traditional understanding of what survey data represent. We argue that this approach contributes to a better understanding of the cognitive processes involved in survey responses. In turn, this could help us make better use of the data that such methods provide.},
author = {Arnulf, Jan Ketil and Larsen, Kai Rune and Martinsen, Øyvind Lund and Egeland, Thore},
date = {2018-12-01},
doi = {10.3758/s13428-017-0999-y},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/V8V9ZKJ8/Arnulf et al. - 2018 - The failing measurement of attitudes How semantic.pdf},
issn = {1554-3528},
journaltitle = {Behavior Research Methods},
keywords = {Attitude strength,Semantic analysis,Semantic theory of survey response (STSR),Survey response,Surveys},
langid = {english},
number = {6},
pages = {2345-2365},
shortjournal = {Behav Res},
shorttitle = {The Failing Measurement of Attitudes},
title = {The Failing Measurement of Attitudes: {{How}} Semantic Determinants of Individual Survey Responses Come to Replace Measures of Attitude Strength},
volume = {50}
}
@article{arnulf2018a,
abstract = {Research on sensemaking in organisations and on linguistic relativity suggests that speakers of the same language may use this language in different ways to construct social realities at work. We apply a semantic theory of survey response (STSR) to explore such differences in quantitative survey research. Using text analysis algorithms, we have studied how language from three media domains–the business press, PR Newswire and general newspapers–has differential explanatory value for analysing survey responses in leadership research. We projected well-known surveys measuring leadership, motivation and outcomes into large text samples from these three media domains significantly different impacts on survey responses. Business press language was best in explaining leadership-related items, PR language best at explaining organizational results and “ordinary” newspaper language seemed to explain the relationship among motivation items. These findings shed light on how different public arenas construct organizational realities in different ways, and how these differences have consequences on methodology in research on leadership.},
author = {Arnulf, Jan Ketil and Larsen, Kai Rune and Martinsen, Øyvind Lund},
date = {2018-12-05},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0207643},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/P95EC3P3/Arnulf et al. - 2018 - Semantic algorithms can detect how media language .pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/HLEQKLX9/article.html},
issn = {1932-6203},
journaltitle = {PLOS ONE},
keywords = {Algorithms,Employment,Language,Lexical semantics,Natural language,Semantics,Surveys,Vector spaces},
langid = {english},
number = {12},
pages = {e0207643},
shortjournal = {PLOS ONE},
title = {Semantic Algorithms Can Detect How Media Language Shapes Survey Responses in Organizational Behaviour},
volume = {13}
}
@article{arnulf2019,
abstract = {This is a methodological presentation of the relationship between semantics and survey statistics in human resource development (HRD) research. This study starts with an introduction to the semantic theory of survey response (STSR) and proceeds by offering a guided approach to conducting such analyses. The reader is presented with two types of semantic algorithms and a brief overview of how they are calculated and how they can be accessed by interested researchers. Subsequently, we use semantic data to reanalyze a previously published study on the relationships between perceptions of a trainee program, intrinsic motivation, and work outcomes. The semantic algorithms can explain between 31 and 55\% of the variation in the observed correlations. This article shows how the statistical models originally used to explore the survey data can be replicated using semantics either alone or as an identifiable source of variation in the data. All the steps are presented in detail, and the datasets as well as the statistical syntax necessary to perform the analyses are made available to the readers. Implications for methodology and the improvement of predictive validity in HRD research are discussed.},
author = {Arnulf, Jan K. and Dysvik, Anders and Larsen, Kai R.},
date = {2019},
doi = {10.1002/hrdq.21324},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/EYYJ4UBI/Arnulf et al. - 2019 - Measuring semantic components in training and moti.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/GDUDQHXH/hrdq.html},
issn = {1532-1096},
journaltitle = {Human Resource Development Quarterly},
keywords = {motivation,semantic algorithms,survey data,training},
langid = {english},
number = {1},
pages = {17-38},
shorttitle = {Measuring Semantic Components in Training and Motivation},
title = {Measuring Semantic Components in Training and Motivation: {{A}} Methodological Introduction to the Semantic Theory of Survey Response},
volume = {30}
}
@article{arstila2012,
abstract = {The experienced speed of the passage of time is not constant as time can seem to fly or slow down depending on the circumstances we are in. Anecdotally accidents and other frightening events are extreme examples of the latter; people who have survived from accidents often report altered phenomenology including how everything appeared to happen in slow motion. While the experienced phenomenology has been investigated, there are no explanations about how one can have these experiences. Instead, the only recently discussed explanation suggests that the anecdotal phenomenology is due to memory effects and hence not really experienced during the accidents. The purpose of this article is i) to reintroduce the currently-forgotten comprehensively altered phenomenology that some people experience during the accidents, ii) to explain why the recent experiments fail to touch the issue at hand, and iii) to suggest a new framework to explain what happens when people experience time slowing down in these cases. The presented solution is realistic in a sense that it maintains that sometimes people really do have such experiences.},
author = {Arstila, Valtteri},
date = {2012},
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00196},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/BWAWWTU5/Arstila - 2012 - Time Slows Down during Accidents.pdf},
issn = {1664-1078},
journaltitle = {Frontiers in Psychology},
keywords = {Passage of time,Subjective time,Time consciousness},
langid = {english},
shortjournal = {Front. Psychol.},
title = {Time Slows down during Accidents},
volume = {3}
}
@book{ashby1960,
author = {Ashby, William Ross},
date = {1960},
edition = {2d ed., rev.},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/E7TKI37J/Ashby - 1960 - Design for a Brain The Origin of Adaptive Behavio.pdf},
keywords = {Brain,Calculators},
langid = {english},
location = {{New York}},
publisher = {{Wiley}},
shorttitle = {Design for a {{Brain}}},
title = {Design for a Brain: {{The}} Origin of Adaptive Behavior}
}
@article{Aston-Jones2005,
author = {Aston-Jones, Gary and Cohen, Jonathan D.},
date = {2005},
doi = {10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/6HQKFJLM/Aston-Jones, Cohen - 2005 - An Integrative Theory of Locus Coeruleus-Norepinephrine Function Adaptive Gain and Optimal Performance.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/VY2ABQRI/Aston-Jones, Cohen - 2005 - An Integrative Theory of Locus Coeruleus-Norepinephrine Function Adaptive Gain and Optimal Performance.pdf},
journaltitle = {Annual Review of Neuroscience},
keywords = {anterior cingulate cortex,clean_citation,decision making,neuromodulation,optimization,orbitofrontal cortex,paper_pass,paper3_pass_t,utility},
number = {1},
pages = {403-450},
title = {An Integrative Theory of Locus Coeruleus-Norepinephrine Function: {{Adaptive}} Gain and Optimal Performance},
volume = {28}
}
@book{azzalini2019,
author = {Azzalini, A.},
date = {2019},
location = {{Università di Padova, Italia}},
title = {The {{R}} Package Sn: {{The}} Skew-Normal and Related Distributions Such as the Skew-t (Version 1.5-4).},
url = {http://azzalini.stat.unipd.it/SN}
}
@book{Baddeley1997,
abstract = {Reformatted and including new chapters, this revised edition covers the topic of human memory and includes the role of consciousness in learning and memory, previously omitted from the first publication due to a lack of agreement about the new area of research. The three additional chapters cover: the philosophy and empirical factors influencing the study of consciousness; implicit knowledge and learning; and the evidence for implicit memory and its relationship to the phenomenal experience of 'remembering' and 'knowing'.},
author = {Baddeley, A},
date = {1997},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper_pass},
location = {{Hove, England}},
pagetotal = {420},
publisher = {{Psychology Press}},
title = {Human Memory. {{Theory}} and Practice}
}
@article{baguley2009,
author = {Baguley, Thom},
date = {2009},
doi = {10.1348/000712608X377117},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/EJZER6N6/Baguley - 2009 - Standardized or simple effect size What should be.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/QREA2NDP/Baguley - 2009 - Standardized or simple effect size What should be.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/7B6PXWHW/000712608X377117.html;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/7Y6RRMEB/000712608X377117.html},
journaltitle = {British Journal of Psychology},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper_meta_analysis,paper3_pass_t},
pages = {603-617},
shorttitle = {Standardized or {{Simple Effect Size}}},
title = {Standardized or Simple Effect Size: {{What}} Should Be Reported?},
volume = {100}
}
@book{bailey2015,
author = {Bailey, Eric},
date = {2015},
title = {{{shinyBS}}: {{Twitter}} Bootstrap Components for Shiny},
url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=shinyBS}
}
@article{Bates2015,
author = {Bates, Douglas and Mächler, Martin and Bolker, Ben and Walker, Steve},
date = {2015},
doi = {10.18637/jss.v067.i01},
journaltitle = {Journal of Statistical Software},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper3_pass_t},
number = {1},
pages = {1-48},
title = {Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4},
volume = {67}
}
@book{bates2019,
author = {Bates, Douglas and Maechler, Martin and Bolker, Ben},
date = {2019},
note = {R package version 1.0-7},
title = {{{mlmRev}}: Examples from Multilevel Modelling Software Review},
url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mlmRev}
}
@article{beaulieu-prevost2005,
abstract = {Almost every published study having examined the association between people’s dream recall frequency (DRF) and their Attitude Towards Dreams has found a positive relation. However, all but two of these studies have relied exclusively on Estimated DRF as the measure of DRF. The main goal of the present study was to evaluate the hypothesis that attitude towards dreams is not related to DRF but that it influences the estimated DRF through a process of selective attention. A secondary goal was to evaluate the adequacy of Estimated DRF as a measure of diary DRF as well as in relation to Attitude Towards Dreams. Participants’ (N=82) Attitude Towards Dreams and Estimated DRF were assessed by a self-reported questionnaire while diary DRF was calculated from a dream log. As predicted, Attitude Towards Dreams and diary DRF were independently related to Estimated DRF. In addition, estimations of DRF were found to be inaccurate; individuals with a negative attitude towards dreams were more likely to underestimate their diary DRF. The data show that the choice of DRF measures has a direct and significant impact on the pattern and magnitude of the relation between people’s DRF and their Attitude Towards Dreams.},
author = {Beaulieu-Prévost, Dominic and Zadra, Antonio},
date = {2005-03-01},
doi = {10.1016/j.paid.2004.06.017},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/G8YKMD8G/S0191886904002211.html},
issn = {0191-8869},
journaltitle = {Personality and Individual Differences},
keywords = {Attitude towards dreams,Dream recall,Dreams,Life-style hypothesis,Measurement,Personality,Systematic error},
number = {4},
pages = {919-927},
shortjournal = {Personality and Individual Differences},
shorttitle = {Dream Recall Frequency and Attitude towards Dreams},
title = {Dream Recall Frequency and Attitude towards Dreams: A Reinterpretation of the Relation},
volume = {38}
}
@article{beaulieu-prevost2007,
abstract = {Many studies have reported positive correlations between dream recall frequency (DRF) and measures of absorption, psychological boundaries and attitude towards dreams. A majority of these studies, ho...},
author = {Beaulieu‐Prévost, Dominic and Zadra, Antonio},
date = {2007-03-01},
doi = {10.1111/j.1365-2869.2007.00572.x},
file = {/home/jt/1.paper/Beaulieu‐Prévost and Zadra - 2007 - Absorption, psychological boundaries and attitude .pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/VC5XVDQV/j.1365-2869.2007.00572.html},
issn = {1365-2869},
journaltitle = {Journal of Sleep Research},
langid = {english},
number = {1},
pages = {51-59},
shorttitle = {Absorption, Psychological Boundaries and Attitude towards Dreams as Correlates of Dream Recall},
title = {Absorption, Psychological Boundaries and Attitude towards Dreams as Correlates of Dream Recall: Two Decades of Research Seen through a Meta‐analysis},
volume = {16}
}
@article{Berinsky2012,
author = {Berinsky, Adam J. and Huber, Gregory A. and Lenz, Gabriel S.},
date = {2012},
doi = {10.1093/pan/mpr057},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/TCPMALLG/Berinsky, Huber, Lenz - 2012 - Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research Amazon.com's mechanical turk.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/WJI2NKPD/Berinsky, Huber, Lenz - 2012 - Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research Amazon.com's mechanical turk.pdf},
journaltitle = {Political Analysis},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper3_pass_t},
pages = {351-368},
title = {Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: {{Amazon}}.Com's {{Mechanical Turk}}},
volume = {20}
}
@article{Betsch1999,
author = {Betsch, Tilmann and Siebler, F and Marz, P and Hormuth, S and Dickenberger, D},
date = {1999},
doi = {10.1177/0146167299025004006},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/R8V7WPYT/Betsch et al. - 1999 - The moderating role of category salience and category focus in judgments of set size and frequency of occurrence.pdf},
journaltitle = {Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper_pass},
pages = {463-481},
title = {The Moderating Role of Category Salience and Category Focus in Judgments of Set Size and Frequency of Occurrence},
volume = {25}
}
@article{Betsch2010,
author = {Betsch, Tilmann and Glauer, Madlen and Renkewitz, Frank and Winkler, Isabell and Sedlmeier, Peter},
date = {2010},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/JKUR7P9Z/Betsch et al. - 2010 - Encoding, storage and judgment of experienced frequency and duration.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/ZZNJ3CXS/Betsch et al. - 2010 - Encoding, storage and judgment of experienced frequency and duration.pdf},
journaltitle = {Judgment and Decision Making},
keywords = {clean_citation,frequency processing,long-term memory,paper_pass,paper3_pass_t,quantitative judgment,time perception},
pages = {347-364},
title = {Encoding, Storage and Judgment of Experienced Frequency and Duration},
volume = {5}
}
@article{Bobko1986,
author = {Bobko, Douglas J. and Bobko, Philip and Davis, Mark A},
date = {1986},
doi = {10.1177/001872088602800203},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/QZZSRXHN/Bobko, Bobko, Davis - 1986 - Effect of visual display scale on duration estimates.pdf},
journaltitle = {Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper_pass},
number = {2},
pages = {153-158},
title = {Effect of Visual Display Scale on Duration Estimates},
volume = {28}
}
@article{bolacchi,
abstract = {Scientific knowledge as opposed to common-sense knowledge entails a methodological revolution based on a search not for essences, in Aristotelian sense, but for mathematical functions, in Galilean sense, originated from the controlled experiment and founded on the concept of a closed or isolated system. The Priestley-Lavoisier dispute is an historical example that shows clearly the disjunction between pre-science and science. This methodological revolution has not yet been achieved in the field of “social sciences” for the persisting prejudices about dualism between man and nature. Starting from this situation, the paper emphasizes the need for a definition of the research about man and society that overcomes the obstacles and the presuppositions of philosophical ideology and common sense, according to the distinctive features of scientific inquiry and the corresponding requirements for the scientific language. In particular, with reference to the language of every science, the condition of semantic homogeneity of predicates is analyzed, and the main misunderstandings deriving from the non-conformity to this basic criterion (that have so far not allowed a development of a real social science) are pointed out; namely: (a) the consideration of the languages that designate the different fields of research (economics, psychology and sociology) as pairwise disjoint sets, even if there are clear intersections among them, and (b) the resort within the current “social sciences” language to pseudofunctions, whose domain is a set of internal (cognitive) events, or a set of biological events, and the range is a set of external (behavioral) events. According to these remarks, some criticisms to McIntyre’s paper, published in this issue, are formulated.},
author = {Bolacchi, Giulio},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/35GYU8WZ/Bolacchi - ON “SOCIAL SCIENCES” AND SCIENCE.pdf},
journaltitle = {SOCIAL SCIENCES},
langid = {english},
pages = {14},
title = {{{ON}} “{{SOCIAL SCIENCES}}” {{AND SCIENCE}}}
}
@thesis{Bonanno1996,
author = {Bonanno, Joanne},
date = {1996},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/8J6V9DUJ/Bonanno - 1996 - The list-strength effect and categorical frequency memory Tests of availability.pdf},
keywords = {paper_meta_analysis},
title = {The List-Strength Effect and Categorical Frequency Memory: {{Tests}} of Availability},
type = {Master's thesis},
url = {http://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/568}
}
@article{Bornstein1989,
author = {Bornstein, Robert F},
date = {1989},
doi = {10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/4FJITAAN/Bornstein - 1989 - Exposure and affect Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/WWIS295K/Bornstein - 1989 - Exposure and affect Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/X9DN2DUZ/Bornstein - 1989 - Exposure and affect Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987.pdf},
journaltitle = {Psychological Bulletin},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper_meta_analysis,paper3_pass_t},
pages = {265-289},
title = {Exposure and Affect: {{Overview}} and Meta-Analysis of Research, 1968-1987},
volume = {106}
}
@book{Bortz2010,
author = {Bortz, Jürgen and Schuster, Christof},
date = {2010},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/M7Z5ZEAB/Bortz, Schuster - 2010 - Statistik für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler.pdf},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper_pass},
location = {{Berlin, Germany}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
title = {Statistik Für {{Human}}- Und {{Sozialwissenschaftler}}}
}
@inproceedings{Bottini2010,
author = {Bottini, Roberto and Casasanto, Daniel},
booktitle = {Spatial Cognition {{VII}}},
date = {2010},
editor = {Hölscher, Christoph and Shipley, Thomas F and Olivetti Belardinelli, Marta and Bateman, John A and Newcombe, Nora S},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/GB7KUQGN/Bottini, Casasanto - 2010 - Implicit Spatial Length Modulates Time Estimates, But Not Vice Versa.pdf},
keywords = {paper_meta_analysis},
location = {{Berlin, Germany}},
pages = {152-162},
publisher = {{Springer}},
title = {Implicit Spatial Length Modulates Time Estimates, but Not Vice Versa}
}
@article{Bradley2008,
author = {Bradley, M B and Miccoli, L M and Escrig, M A and Lang, P J},
date = {2008},
doi = {10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00654.x},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/HYGY4M2L/Bradley et al. - 2008 - The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and automatic activation.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/IR6QDTWS/Bradley et al. - 2008 - The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and automatic activation.pdf},
journaltitle = {Psychophysiology},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper_pass,paper3_pass_t},
number = {4},
pages = {602-607},
title = {The Pupil as a Measure of Emotional Arousal and Automatic Activation},
volume = {45}
}
@article{bringmann2016,
abstract = {Discussions of psychological measurement are largely disconnected from issues of measurement in the natural sciences. We show that there are interesting parallels and connections between the two, by focusing on a real and detailed example (temperature) from the history of science. More specifically, our novel approach is to study the issue of validity based on the history of measurement in physics, which will lead to three concrete points that are relevant for the validity debate in psychology. First of all, studying the causal mechanisms underlying the measurements can be crucial for evaluating whether the measurements are valid. Secondly, psychologists would benefit from focusing more on the robustness of measurements. Finally, we argue that it is possible to make good science based on (relatively) bad measurements, and that the explanatory success of science can contribute to justifying the validity of measurements.},
author = {Bringmann, Laura F. and Eronen, Markus I.},
date = {2016-02},
doi = {10.1177/0959354315617253},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/4RW5YWF8/Bringmann and Eronen - 2016 - Heating up the measurement debate What psychologi.pdf},
issn = {0959-3543, 1461-7447},
journaltitle = {Theory \& Psychology},
langid = {english},
number = {1},
pages = {27-43},
shortjournal = {Theory \& Psychology},
shorttitle = {Heating up the Measurement Debate},
title = {Heating up the Measurement Debate: {{What}} Psychologists Can Learn from the History of Physics},
volume = {26}
}
@article{Brown1997,
author = {Brown, S. W.},
date = {1997},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/85RFW6HS/Brown - 1997 - Attentional resources in timing interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks.pdf},
journaltitle = {Perception \& Psychophysics},
keywords = {paper_meta_analysis},
pages = {1118-1140},
title = {Attentional Resources in Timing: {{Interference}} Effects in Concurrent Temporal and Nontemporal Working Memory Tasks.},
volume = {59}
}
@incollection{Brown2008b,
author = {Brown, S. W.},
booktitle = {Psychology of Time},
date = {2008},
editor = {Grondin, Simon},
pages = {111-138},
publisher = {{Bingley, England: Emerald Group}},
title = {Time and Attention: {{Review}} of the Literature}
}
@article{Bueti2009,
abstract = {The development of sub-disciplines within cognitive neuroscience follows common sense categories such as language, audition, action, memory, emotion and perception among others. There are also well-established research programmes into temporal perception, spatial perception and mathematical cognition that also reflect the subjective impression of how experience is constructed. There is of course no reason why the brain should respect these common sense, text book divisions and, here, we discuss the contention that generalized magnitude processing is a more accurate conceptual description of how the brain deals with information about time, space, number and other dimensions. The roots of the case for linking magnitudes are based on the use to which magnitude information is put (action), the way in which we learn about magnitudes (ontogeny), shared properties and locations of magnitude processing neurons, the effects of brain lesions and behavioural interference studies. Here, we assess this idea in the context of a theory of magnitude, which proposed common processing mechanisms of time, space, number and other dimensions.},
author = {Bueti, Domenica and Walsh, Vincent},
date = {2009},
doi = {10.1098/rstb.2009.0028},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/R2TKVSAT/Bueti, Walsh - 2009 - The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes.pdf},
journaltitle = {Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences},
keywords = {clean_citation,Humans,Mental Processes,Mental Processes: physiology,paper_pass,Parietal Lobe,Parietal Lobe: physiology,Space Perception,Space Perception: physiology,Time Perception,Time Perception: physiology},
pages = {1831-1840},
title = {The Parietal Cortex and the Representation of Time, Space, Number and Other Magnitudes.},
volume = {364}
}
@article{Bugelski1971,
author = {Bugelski, B. R. and Mcmahon, Margaret L.},
date = {1971},
doi = {10.1037/h0031337},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/JKG8E3GM/Bugelski and Mcmahon - 1971 - The total time hypothesis A reply to Stubin, Heur.pdf},
journaltitle = {Journal of Experimental Psychology},
keywords = {paper_meta_analysis},
pages = {165-166},
title = {The Total Time Hypothesis: {{A}} Reply to {{Stubin}}, {{Heurer}}, and {{Tatz}}},
volume = {90}
}
@article{Buhrmester2018,
author = {Buhrmester, Michael D. and Talaifar, Sanaz and Gosling, Samuel D.},
date = {2018},
doi = {10.1177/1745691617706516},
journaltitle = {Perspectives on Psychological Science},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper3_pass_t},
pages = {149-154},
title = {An Evaluation of {{Amazon}}'s {{Mechanical Turk}}, Its Rapid Rise, and Its Effective Use},
volume = {13}
}
@article{Buhusi2005,
abstract = {Time is a fundamental dimension of life. It is crucial for decisions about quantity, speed of movement and rate of return, as well as for motor control in walking, speech, playing or appreciating music, and participating in sports. Traditionally, the way in which time is perceived, represented and estimated has been explained using a pacemaker-accumulator model that is not only straightforward, but also surprisingly powerful in explaining behavioural and biological data. However, recent advances have challenged this traditional view. It is now proposed that the brain represents time in a distributed manner and tells the time by detecting the coincidental activation of different neural populations.},
author = {Buhusi, Catalin V and Meck, Warren H},
date = {2005},
doi = {10.1038/nrn1764},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/G948QMZ9/Buhusi, Meck - 2005 - What makes us tick Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing.pdf},
journaltitle = {Nature Reviews. Neuroscience},
keywords = {Animals,Brain,Brain: physiology,clean_citation,Humans,Models,Neurological,paper_pass,Time Perception,Time Perception: physiology},
pages = {755-765},
title = {What Makes Us Tick? {{Functional}} and Neural Mechanisms of Interval Timing.},
volume = {6}
}
@book{burkhardt2019,
author = {Burkhardt, Markus and Titz, Johannes},
date = {2019},
title = {Cofad: {{Contrast}} Analysis for Factorial Designs}
}
@article{Cappelletti2009,
author = {Cappelletti, Marinella and Freeman, Elliot D. and Cipolotti, Lisa},
date = {2009},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.024},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/Y73NN99E/Cappelletti et al. - 2009 - Dissociations and interactions between time, numer.pdf},
journaltitle = {Neuropsychologia},
keywords = {paper_meta_analysis},
pages = {2732-2748},
title = {Dissociations and Interactions between Time, Numerosity and Space Processing},
volume = {47}
}
@article{carter2019a,
author = {Carter, Evan C. and Schönbrodt, Felix D. and Gervais, Will M. and Hilgard, Joseph},
date = {2019-06},
doi = {10.1177/2515245919847196},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/6EYTP5ZC/Carter et al. - 2019 - Correcting for bias in psychology a comparison of.pdf},
issn = {2515-2459, 2515-2467},
journaltitle = {Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science},
langid = {english},
number = {2},
pages = {115-144},
shortjournal = {Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science},
shorttitle = {Correcting for {{Bias}} in {{Psychology}}},
title = {Correcting for Bias in Psychology: A Comparison of Meta-Analytic Methods},
volume = {2}
}
@article{Casasanto2008,
author = {Casasanto, Daniel and Boroditsky, Lera},
date = {2008},
doi = {10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/3HGF9XKJ/Casasanto and Boroditsky - 2008 - Time in the mind Using space to think about time.pdf},
journaltitle = {Cognition},
keywords = {paper_meta_analysis},
pages = {579-593},
title = {Time in the Mind: {{Using}} Space to Think about Time},
volume = {106}
}
@article{Casasanto2010,
author = {Casasanto, Daniel and Fotakopoulou, Olga and Boroditsky, Lera},
date = {2010},
doi = {10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01094.x},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/Z2WFUFUD/Casasanto, Fotakopoulou, Boroditsky - 2010 - Space and time in the child's mind Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry.pdf},
journaltitle = {Cognitive Science},
keywords = {paper_meta_analysis},
pages = {387-405},
title = {Space and Time in the Child's Mind: {{Evidence}} for a Cross-Dimensional Asymmetry},
volume = {34}
}
@article{cepeda2006,
abstract = {A meta-analysis of the distributed practice effect was performed to illuminate the effects of temporal variables that have been neglected in previous reviews. This review found 839 assessments of distributed practice in 317 experiments located in 184 articles. Effects of spacing (consecutive massed presentations vs. spaced learning episodes) and lag (less spaced vs. more spaced learning episodes) were examined, as were expanding inter-study interval effects. Analyses suggest that inter-study interval (ISI) and retention interval operate jointly to affect final test retention; specifically, the ISI producing maximal retention increased as retention interval increased. Areas needing future research and theoretical implications are discussed.},
author = {Cepeda, Nicholas J. and Pashler, Harold and Vul, Edward and Wixted, John T. and Rohrer, Doug},
date = {2006},
doi = {10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/J8VHA2LR/Cepeda et al. - 2006 - Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks A rev.pdf},
issn = {1939-1455, 0033-2909},
journaltitle = {Psychological Bulletin},
langid = {english},
number = {3},
pages = {354-380},
shorttitle = {Distributed Practice in Verbal Recall Tasks},
title = {Distributed Practice in Verbal Recall Tasks: {{A}} Review and Quantitative Synthesis.},
volume = {132}
}
@book{chang2019,
author = {Chang, Winston and Cheng, Joe and Allaire, J. J. and Xie, Yihui and McPherson, Jonathan},
date = {2019},
title = {Shiny: {{Web}} Application Framework for {{R}}},
url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=shiny}
}
@book{chang2019a,
author = {Chang, Winston and Csárdi, Gábor},
date = {2019},
note = {R package version 1.3.1},
title = {Shinytest: Test Shiny Apps},
url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=shinytest}
}
@article{cipriani2018,
abstract = {Summary
Background
Major depressive disorder is one of the most common, burdensome, and costly psychiatric disorders worldwide in adults. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are available; however, because of inadequate resources, antidepressants are used more frequently than psychological interventions. Prescription of these agents should be informed by the best available evidence. Therefore, we aimed to update and expand our previous work to compare and rank antidepressants for the acute treatment of adults with unipolar major depressive disorder.
Methods
We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS database, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, PsycINFO, the websites of regulatory agencies, and international registers for published and unpublished, double-blind, randomised controlled trials from their inception to Jan 8, 2016. We included placebo-controlled and head-to-head trials of 21 antidepressants used for the acute treatment of adults (≥18 years old and of both sexes) with major depressive disorder diagnosed according to standard operationalised criteria. We excluded quasi-randomised trials and trials that were incomplete or included 20\% or more of participants with bipolar disorder, psychotic depression, or treatment-resistant depression; or patients with a serious concomitant medical illness. We extracted data following a predefined hierarchy. In network meta-analysis, we used group-level data. We assessed the studies' risk of bias in accordance to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Primary outcomes were efficacy (response rate) and acceptability (treatment discontinuations due to any cause). We estimated summary odds ratios (ORs) using pairwise and network meta-analysis with random effects. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42012002291.
Findings
We identified 28\hphantom{,}552 citations and of these included 522 trials comprising 116\hphantom{,}477 participants. In terms of efficacy, all antidepressants were more effective than placebo, with ORs ranging between 2·13 (95\% credible interval [CrI] 1·89–2·41) for amitriptyline and 1·37 (1·16–1·63) for reboxetine. For acceptability, only agomelatine (OR 0·84, 95\% CrI 0·72–0·97) and fluoxetine (0·88, 0·80–0·96) were associated with fewer dropouts than placebo, whereas clomipramine was worse than placebo (1·30, 1·01–1·68). When all trials were considered, differences in ORs between antidepressants ranged from 1·15 to 1·55 for efficacy and from 0·64 to 0·83 for acceptability, with wide CrIs on most of the comparative analyses. In head-to-head studies, agomelatine, amitriptyline, escitalopram, mirtazapine, paroxetine, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine were more effective than other antidepressants (range of ORs 1·19–1·96), whereas fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, reboxetine, and trazodone were the least efficacious drugs (0·51–0·84). For acceptability, agomelatine, citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, sertraline, and vortioxetine were more tolerable than other antidepressants (range of ORs 0·43–0·77), whereas amitriptyline, clomipramine, duloxetine, fluvoxamine, reboxetine, trazodone, and venlafaxine had the highest dropout rates (1·30–2·32). 46 (9\%) of 522 trials were rated as high risk of bias, 380 (73\%) trials as moderate, and 96 (18\%) as low; and the certainty of evidence was moderate to very low.
Interpretation
All antidepressants were more efficacious than placebo in adults with major depressive disorder. Smaller differences between active drugs were found when placebo-controlled trials were included in the analysis, whereas there was more variability in efficacy and acceptability in head-to-head trials. These results should serve evidence-based practice and inform patients, physicians, guideline developers, and policy makers on the relative merits of the different antidepressants.
Funding
National Institute for Health Research Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre and the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.},
author = {Cipriani, Andrea and Furukawa, Toshi A and Salanti, Georgia and Chaimani, Anna and Atkinson, Lauren Z and Ogawa, Yusuke and Leucht, Stefan and Ruhe, Henricus G and Turner, Erick H and Higgins, Julian P T and Egger, Matthias and Takeshima, Nozomi and Hayasaka, Yu and Imai, Hissei and Shinohara, Kiyomi and Tajika, Aran and Ioannidis, John P A and Geddes, John R},
date = {2018-04-07},
doi = {10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/VLFDSGAM/Cipriani et al. - 2018 - Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antid.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/T3CCN2BZ/S0140673617328027.html},
issn = {0140-6736},
journaltitle = {The Lancet},
number = {10128},
pages = {1357-1366},
shortjournal = {The Lancet},
shorttitle = {Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of 21 Antidepressant Drugs for the Acute Treatment of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder},
title = {Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of 21 Antidepressant Drugs for the Acute Treatment of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis},
volume = {391}
}
@book{cohen1988,
author = {Cohen, J.},
date = {1988},
edition = {2},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/AQLN4JG3/Cohen - 1988 - Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Scie.pdf},
location = {{Hillsdale, NJ}},
publisher = {{Lawrence Erlbaum Associates}},
title = {Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences}
}
@article{cohen1992,
abstract = {One possible reason for the continued neglect of statistical power analysis in research in the behavioral sciences is the inaccessibility of or difficulty with the standard material. A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is provided here. Effect-size indexes and conventional values for these are given for operationally defined small, medium, and large effects. The sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests: (a) the difference between independent means, (b) the significance of a product-moment correlation, (c) the difference between independent rs, (d) the sign test, (e) the difference between independent proportions, (f) chi-square tests for goodness of fit and contingency tables, (g) one-way analysis of variance, and (h) the significance of a multiple or multiple partial correlation.},
author = {Cohen, J.},
date = {1992-07},
eprint = {19565683},
eprinttype = {pmid},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/NVD5ZJX9/Cohen - 1992 - A power primer.pdf},
issn = {0033-2909},
journaltitle = {Psychological Bulletin},
keywords = {Chi-Square Distribution,Psychology,Sample Size},
langid = {english},
pages = {155-159},
title = {A Power Primer},
volume = {112}
}
@article{coombs1960,
abstract = {'An abstract theory of psychological data has been constructed for the purpose of organizing and systematizing the domain of psychological methodology. It is asserted that from the point of view of psychological measurement theories all behavioral observations satisfy, at the simplest level, each of three dichotomies, generating eight classes called octants which were organized into four quadrants. Any behavioral observations when mapped into data involve accepting a miniature behavioral theory implicit in the method used to analyze the data.' (31 ref., brief glossary, appendix of axioms and definitions) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)},
author = {Coombs, C. H.},
date = {1960-05},
doi = {10.1037/h0047773},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/LPZD65NX/Coombs - 1960 - A theory of data.pdf},
issn = {0033-295X},
journaltitle = {Psychological Review},
keywords = {abstract theory,Measurement,psychological data,psychological measurement,psychological theories,Psychological Theories,Statistical Data},
number = {3},
pages = {143-159},
shortjournal = {Psychological Review},
title = {A Theory of Data},
volume = {67}
}
@article{Cooper1967,
author = {Cooper, Elaine H and Pantle, Allan J},
date = {1967},
doi = {10.1037/h0025052},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/XKQ53HEB/Cooper, Pantle - 1967 - The total-time hypothesis in verbal learning.pdf},
journaltitle = {Psychological Bulletin},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper_pass},
pages = {221-234},
title = {The Total-Time Hypothesis in Verbal Learning},
volume = {68}
}
@book{csardi2019,
author = {Csárdi, Gábor},
date = {2019},
note = {R package version 2.1.1},
title = {Cranlogs: Download Logs from the '{{RStudio}}' '{{CRAN}}' Mirror},
url = {https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cranlogs}
}
@article{DeJonge2012,
author = {De Jonge, Mario and Tabbers, Huib K. and Pecher, Diane and Zeelenberg, René},
date = {2012},
doi = {10.1037/a0025897},
eprint = {22004269},
eprinttype = {pmid},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/NKQVWBB4/De Jonge et al. - 2012 - The effect of study time distribution on learning and retention A Goldilocks principle for presentation rate.pdf},
journaltitle = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition},
keywords = {paper_meta_analysis},
pages = {405-412},
title = {The Effect of Study Time Distribution on Learning and Retention: {{A Goldilocks}} Principle for Presentation Rate},
volume = {38}
}
@article{deLeeuw2015,
author = {de Leeuw, Joshua R.},
date = {2015},
doi = {10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y},
journaltitle = {Behavior Research Methods},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper3_pass_t},
options = {useprefix=true},
pages = {1-12},
title = {{{jsPsych}}: {{A JavaScript}} Library for Creating Behavioral Experiments in a {{Web}} Browser},
volume = {47}
}
@article{DeLong1981,
abstract = {Subjects observing differently scaled environments undergo systematic shifts in the experience of time. The experience of temporal duration is compressed relative to the clock in the same proportion as scale-model environments being observed are compressed relative to the full-sized environment. This research suggests that spatial scale may be a principal mediator in the experience of time.},
author = {DeLong, A.},
date = {1981},
doi = {10.1126/science.7256273},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/U4XE9XF3/DeLong - 1981 - Phenomenological space-time Toward an experiential relativity(2).pdf},
journaltitle = {Science},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper_pass},
number = {4508},
pages = {681-683},
title = {Phenomenological Space-Time: {{Toward}} an Experiential Relativity},
volume = {213}
}
@article{dewinter2016,
author = {de Winter, Joost C. F. and Gosling, Samuel D. and Potter, Jeff},
date = {2016},
doi = {10.1037/met0000079},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/MKLRBANG/de Winter et al. - 2016 - Comparing the Pearson and Spearman Correlation Coe.pdf},
issn = {1939-1463, 1082-989X},
journaltitle = {Psychological Methods},
langid = {english},
number = {3},
options = {useprefix=true},
pages = {273-290},
shorttitle = {Comparing the {{Pearson}} and {{Spearman Correlation Coefficients}} across {{Distributions}} and {{Sample Sizes}}},
title = {Comparing the {{Pearson}} and {{Spearman Correlation Coefficients}} across {{Distributions}} and {{Sample Sizes}}: {{A Tutorial Using Simulations}} and {{Empirical Data}}.},
volume = {21}
}
@collection{dmitrienko2007,
date = {2007},
editor = {Dmitrienko, Alex and Chuang-Stein, Christy and D'Agostino, Ralph B.},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/YK5G7SLQ/Dmitrienko et al. - 2007 - Pharmaceutical statistics using SAS a practical g.pdf},
isbn = {978-1-59047-886-8},
keywords = {Clinical pharmacology,Clinical trials,Drug development,Drugs,Pharmacology,SAS (Computer file),Testing Statistical methods},
langid = {english},
location = {{Cary, N.C}},
note = {OCLC: ocn104659107},
pagetotal = {444},
publisher = {{SAS Institute}},
series = {{{SAS Press}} Series},
shorttitle = {Pharmaceutical Statistics Using {{SAS}}},
title = {Pharmaceutical Statistics Using {{SAS}}: A Practical Guide}
}
@article{Dormal2006,
author = {Dormal, Valérie and Seron, Xavier and Pesenti, Mauro},
date = {2006},
doi = {10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.003},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/X5JAZSTI/Dormal, Seron, Pesenti - 2006 - Numerosity-duration interference a Stroop experiment.pdf},
journaltitle = {Acta Psychologica},
keywords = {paper_meta_analysis},
pages = {109-124},
title = {Numerosity-Duration Interference: {{A Stroop}} Experiment.},
volume = {121}
}
@article{Dougherty1999,
abstract = {Describes a new theory of likelihood judgments based on D. L. Hintzman's (1984, 1988) MINERVA2 memory model. The model, MINERVA-DM (decision making), accounts for a wide range of likelihood-judgment phenomena. Extends the model to expert-probability judgment and shows how MINERVA-DM can account for both good and poor calibration (overconfidence) as a function of varying degrees of expertise. (Author/GCP)},
author = {Dougherty, Michael R. and Gettys, Charles F. and Ogden, Eve E.},
date = {1999},
doi = {10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.180},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/AQRSMMDL/Dougherty, Gettys, Ogden - 1999 - MINERVA-DM A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood.pdf},
journaltitle = {Psychological Review},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper_pass},
pages = {180-209},
title = {{{MINERVA}}-{{DM}}: {{A}} Memory Processes Model for Judgments of Likelihood.},
volume = {106}
}
@article{Droit-Volet2003,
author = {Droit-Volet, Sylvie and Clément, Angélique and Fayol, Michel},
date = {2003},
doi = {10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00180-7},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/TYI4W5Z2/Droit-Volet et al. - 2003 - Time and number discrimination in a bisection task.pdf},
journaltitle = {Journal of Experimental Child Psychology},
keywords = {paper_meta_analysis},
pages = {63-76},
shorttitle = {Time and {{Number Discrimination}} in a {{Bisection Task}} with a {{Sequence}} of {{Stimuli}}},
title = {Time and Number Discrimination in a Bisection Task with a Sequence of Stimuli: {{A}} Developmental Approach},
volume = {84}
}
@article{dubois2016,
abstract = {To date, fMRI research has been concerned primarily with evincing generic principles of brain function through averaging data from multiple subjects. Given rapid developments in both hardware and analysis tools, the field is now poised to study fMRI-derived measures in individual subjects, and to relate these to psychological traits or genetic variations. We discuss issues of validity and reliability that arise when the focus shifts to individual subjects and that are widely applicable across imaging modalities. We also emphasize that individual assessment of neural function with fMRI presents specific challenges and necessitates careful consideration of anatomical and vascular between-subject variability, sources of within-subject variability, and statistical power.},
author = {Dubois, Julien and Adolphs, Ralph},
date = {2016-06},
doi = {10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.014},
eprint = {27138646},
eprinttype = {pmid},
issn = {1364-6613},
journaltitle = {Trends in cognitive sciences},
number = {6},
pages = {425-443},
pmcid = {PMC4886721},
title = {Building a {{Science}} of {{Individual Differences}} from {{fMRI}}},
volume = {20}
}
@article{dunn1988,
abstract = {A joint aim of cognitive psychology and neuropsychology has been the decomposition of mental function—the isolation and characterization of basic processes underlying behavior. By convention, the principal techniques used to identify such processes are based on functional dissociation—the observation of selective effects of variables on tasks. Yet, despite their widespread use, the inferential logic associated with these techniques is flawed. The aims of this article are twofold: (a) to review and make explicit the inferential limits of single and double dissociation; and (b) to introduce a new technique that overcomes these limits. Called reversed association, this new technique is defined as any nonmonotonic relation between two tasks of interest. We argue that reversed association, in place of functional dissociation, offers a sounder basis for inferring the number of functionally independent processes underlying performance and, having fewer assumptions, offers researchers greater scope for discovering such processes and determining their nature and effects. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)},
author = {Dunn, John C. and Kirsner, Kim},
date = {1988},
doi = {10.1037/0033-295X.95.1.91},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/43QZHW5C/Dunn and Kirsner - 1988 - Discovering functionally independent mental proces.pdf},
issn = {0033-295X},
journaltitle = {Psychological Review},
keywords = {Association Learning,Associative Processes,Cognitive Processes,Cognitive Psychology,Humans,Inference,inference about number of independent cognitive processes underlying performance,Learning,Memory,Mental Processes,Mental Recall,Neuropsychology,Psychophysiology,reversed association vs functional dissociation},
pages = {91-101},
shortjournal = {Psychological Review},
shorttitle = {Discovering Functionally Independent Mental Processes},
title = {Discovering Functionally Independent Mental Processes: {{The}} Principle of Reversed Association},
volume = {95}
}
@article{eager2017,
abstract = {Mixed-effects models have emerged as the gold standard of statistical analysis in different sub-fields of linguistics (Baayen, Davidson \& Bates, 2008; Johnson, 2009; Barr, et al, 2013; Gries, 2015). One problematic feature of these models is their failure to converge under maximal (or even near-maximal) random effects structures. The lack of convergence is relatively unaddressed in linguistics and when it is addressed has resulted in statistical practices (e.g. Jaeger, 2009; Gries, 2015; Bates, et al, 2015b) that are premised on the idea that non-convergence is an indication that a random effects structure is over-specified (or not parsimonious), the parsimonious convergence hypothesis (PCH). We test the PCH by running simulations in lme4 under two sets of assumptions for both a linear dependent variable and a binary dependent variable in order to assess the rate of non-convergence for both types of mixed effects models when a known maximal effect structure is used to generate the data (i.e. when non-convergence cannot be explained by random effects with zero variance). Under the PCH, lack of convergence is treated as evidence against a more maximal random effects structure, but that result is not upheld with our simulations. We provide an alternative model, fully specified Bayesian models implemented in rstan (Stan Development Team, 2016; Carpenter, et al, in press) that removed the convergence problems almost entirely in simulations of the same conditions. These results indicate that when there is known non-zero variance for all slopes and intercepts, under realistic distributions of data and with moderate to severe imbalance, mixed effects models in lme4 have moderate to high non-convergence rates which can cause linguistic researchers to wrongfully exclude random effect terms.},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
author = {Eager, Christopher and Roy, Joseph},
date = {2017-01-05},
eprint = {1701.04858},
eprinttype = {arxiv},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/3KQHRZPB/Eager and Roy - 2017 - Mixed Effects Models are Sometimes Terrible.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/8EHPP5JX/1701.html},
keywords = {Statistics - Applications,Statistics - Computation},
primaryClass = {stat},
title = {Mixed {{Effects Models}} Are {{Sometimes Terrible}}},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.04858},
urldate = {2019-06-26}
}
@article{Eagleman2009,
author = {Eagleman, David M and Pariyadath, Vani},
date = {2009},
doi = {10.1098/rstb.2009.0026},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/3D5YE9N7/Eagleman, Pariyadath - 2009 - Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency.pdf;/home/jt/Zotero/storage/U23R2LRI/Eagleman, Pariyadath - 2009 - Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency.pdf},
journaltitle = {Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences},
keywords = {clean_citation,paper3_pass_t},
pages = {1841-1851},
title = {Is Subjective Duration a Signature of Coding Efficiency?},
volume = {364}
}
@article{eddelbuettel2011,
author = {Eddelbuettel, Dirk and François, Romain},
date = {2011},
doi = {10.18637/jss.v040.i08},
journaltitle = {Journal of Statistical Software},
number = {8},
pages = {1--18},
title = {Rcpp: {{Seamless R}} and {{C}}++ Integration},
volume = {40}
}
@book{eddelbuettel2013,
author = {Eddelbuettel, Dirk},
date = {2013},
doi = {10.1007/978-1-4614-6868-4},
location = {{New York}},
publisher = {{Springer}},
title = {Seamless {{R}} and {{C}}++ Integration with {{Rcpp}}}
}
@article{eddelbuettel2017,
author = {Eddelbuettel, Dirk and Balamuta, James Joseph},
date = {2017-08},
doi = {10.7287/peerj.preprints.3188v1},
issn = {2167-9843},
journaltitle = {PeerJ Preprints},
pages = {e3188v1},
title = {Extending {{extitR}} with {{extitC}}++: {{A}} Brief Introduction to {{extitRcpp}}},
volume = {5}
}
@article{Egger1997,
author = {Egger, Matthias and Davey Smith, G and Schneider, M and Minder, Christoph},
date = {1997},
doi = {10.1136/bmj.316.7129.469},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/JRI89WGR/Egger et al. - 1997 - Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.pdf},
journaltitle = {BMJ},
keywords = {paper_meta_analysis},
pages = {629-634},
title = {Bias in Meta-Analysis Detected by a Simple, Graphical Test.},
volume = {315}
}
@article{engeser2010,
abstract = {Engeser, S. \& Langens, T. (2010). Mapping explicit social motives of achievement, power, and affiliation onto the five-factor model of personality. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. Previous research has shown that explicit motives are meaningfully related to the five-factor model of personality. The present study extends this research by using different measures of the explicit social motives of achievement, power and affiliation, and by employing measures of both approach and avoidance of these motives. Correlational and factor analyses demonstrated that explicit motives of achievement, power, and affiliation, both approach and avoidance components of these motives, can be consistently mapped onto personality trait measures of the five-factor model. Implications of this general finding, along with some exceptions, are discussed with regard to further research.},
author = {Engeser, Stefan and Langens, Thomas},
date = {2010},
doi = {10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00773.x},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/SQLSXQVF/Engeser and Langens - 2010 - Mapping explicit social motives of achievement, po.pdf},
issn = {00365564},
journaltitle = {Scandinavian Journal of Psychology},
keywords = {ACHIEVEMENT motivation,BIG Five model,explicit,Five-factor model of personality,Five‐factor model of personality,implicit,INCENTIVE (Psychology),MOTIVATION (Psychology) -- Research,PERSONALITY & motivation,PERSONALITY studies,POWER (Social sciences),social motives,SOCIAL status,traits},
pages = {309-318},
shortjournal = {Scandinavian Journal of Psychology},
title = {Mapping Explicit Social Motives of Achievement, Power, and Affiliation onto the Five-Factor Model of Personality},
volume = {51}
}
@article{eskreis-winkler2019,
abstract = {Our society celebrates failure as a teachable moment. Yet in five studies (total N = 1,674), failure did the opposite: It undermined learning. Across studies, participants answered binary-choice questions, following which they were told they answered correctly (success feedback) or incorrectly (failure feedback). Both types of feedback conveyed the correct answer, because there were only two answer choices. However, on a follow-up test, participants learned less from failure feedback than from success feedback. This effect was replicated across professional, linguistic, and social domains—even when learning from failure was less cognitively taxing than learning from success and even when learning was incentivized. Participants who received failure feedback also remembered fewer of their answer choices. Why does failure undermine learning? Failure is ego threatening, which causes people to tune out. Participants learned less from personal failure than from personal success, yet they learned just as much from other people’s failure as from others’ success. Thus, when ego concerns are muted, people tune in and learn from failure.},
author = {Eskreis-Winkler, Lauren and Fishbach, Ayelet},
date = {2019-12},
doi = {10.1177/0956797619881133},
file = {/home/jt/Zotero/storage/Z23HB2JH/Eskreis-Winkler and Fishbach - 2019 - Not Learning From Failure—the Greatest Failure of .pdf},
issn = {0956-7976, 1467-9280},
journaltitle = {Psychological Science},
langid = {english},
number = {12},
pages = {1733-1744},
shortjournal = {Psychol Sci},
title = {Not {{Learning From Failure}}—the {{Greatest Failure}} of {{All}}},
volume = {30}
}
@article{faraji2014,
author = {Faraji, Mohammad Javad and Preuschoff, Kerstin and Gerstner, Wulfram},
date = {2014-07-21},
doi = {10.1186/1471-2202-15-S1-P159},
eprint = {null},
eprinttype = {pmid},