From 2878d163622bdc8495c7b8a94cda5aaddf5fa582 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: rbong Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 10:09:17 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix run-on sentence --- FAQ.md | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/FAQ.md b/FAQ.md index 9361802..dfa7669 100644 --- a/FAQ.md +++ b/FAQ.md @@ -143,9 +143,10 @@ gitv.vim does not have tests. gv.vim has tests. Flog and gitgraph.nvim have different testing philosophies. -Flog focuses on integration tests. -Because of aggressive removal of function call overhead for optimization, Flog has no small functions to individually unit test for branch drawing. -This also allows ensuring the plugin works end-to-end. +Flog focuses on integration tests instead of unit tests. +There is only one branch drawing function in Flog for optimization. +This eliminates function call overhead, but means that we don't have small branch drawing functions to individually unit test. +Integration tests also ensure the plugin works end-to-end. gitgraph.nvim has unit tests. These types of tests typically allow more easily identifying the exact spot where code is failing.