-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
Copy pathConsidered_for_Inclusion_(CFI)_weak_point_in_solidity
9 lines (5 loc) · 2.04 KB
/
Considered_for_Inclusion_(CFI)_weak_point_in_solidity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
The Constantinople hard fork was a major upgrade to the Ethereum network, which was implemented in February 2019. While the fork included several improvements and upgrades to the network, there were also some weaknesses and vulnerabilities that were discovered.
One potential weakness of the Constantinople fork in Solidity was the reentrancy vulnerability in the EVM. This vulnerability allowed an attacker to repeatedly call a contract function before the previous function call had completed, potentially leading to a loss of funds. While this vulnerability was not introduced by the Constantinople fork, it was discovered during the testing phase and led to a delay in the fork's implementation.
Another weakness of the Constantinople fork in Solidity was the potential for a "chain split" or network partition. This occurs when some nodes in the network upgrade to the new protocol while others continue to use the old protocol, leading to a divergence in the state of the network. While this did not occur during the Constantinople fork, there was concern about the potential for this to happen due to the contentious nature of some of the proposed changes.
Finally, there was also criticism of some of the proposed changes in the Constantinople fork, such as the reduction in the block reward and the introduction of the "Create2" opcode. Some members of the Ethereum community felt that these changes were unnecessary or could potentially have negative consequences for the network.
To address these weaknesses, developers can take several steps to improve the security and reliability of future forks in Solidity. This includes rigorous testing and auditing of the code to identify and fix any vulnerabilities, as well as involving a broad range of stakeholders in the decision-making process to ensure that proposed changes are widely accepted and do not lead to contentious debates. Additionally, developers can implement mechanisms for resolving conflicts and reaching consensus in the event of a chain split, to help ensure the integrity and consistency of the network.