Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need a way to skip info from Specref for a spec #1606

Open
tidoust opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Need a way to skip info from Specref for a spec #1606

tidoust opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@tidoust
Copy link
Member

tidoust commented Dec 16, 2024

Some entries in Specref are currently hardcoded in biblio.json but could rather be contributed by browser-specs, with more accurate information. There's no way to do that properly today because browser-specs leverages the info from Specref whenever it can. Some mechanism is needed to tell browser-specs not to fetch the information from Specref for some specs.

That's typically a temporary need, while the entry gets moved in Specref from biblio.json to browser-specs.json.

tidoust added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2025
This provides a more generic solution to #1606.

Browser-specs has become the main source for Specref for WICG specs and
W3C Editor's Drafts. The code no longer attempts to fetch info for these specs
from Specref as a result.

Tested locally, this will adjust a handful of spec titles (to match the actual
spec title, which seems good). Interestingly, it will also adjust a few WICG
entries for which the spec says the status is "Unofficial Draft", which will
also switch the standing for these specs to "pending". That seems good as well
although we may want to review these changes before we release a new version.
I propose to do that separately in any case. Specs in that category include:
Web Share Target API, preferCurrentTab, the CSS Parser API.

Note: Specref is still being used as source, mainly for WHATWG specs.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant