-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update cuts to match unblinding plan #8
Conversation
After speaking with @thibautlouis, we came to the conclusion that it is "easier" to write explicitly the multipole ranges. Actually, the Here are the cuts used for unblinding
Below is the relevant part of the # Specify default set of spectra and scale cuts
# to be used
defaults:
polarizations: [TT, TE, ET, EE]
polarizations_auto: &polarizations_auto [TT, TE, EE]
lmax: &lmax 8500
scales:
TT: [2, *lmax]
TE: [2, *lmax]
ET: [2, *lmax]
EE: [2, *lmax]
# If True, TE' = (TE + ET) / 2 will be used
# instead of TE and ET separately.
symmetrize: false
data:
experiments:
- dr6_pa4_f220
- dr6_pa5_f090
- dr6_pa5_f150
- dr6_pa6_f090
- dr6_pa6_f150
spectra:
- experiments: [dr6_pa4_f220, dr6_pa4_f220]
polarizations: &polarizations_pa4_f220
- TT
scales: &scales_pa4_f220
TT: [1000, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa4_f220, dr6_pa5_f090]
polarizations: *polarizations_pa4_f220
scales: *scales_pa4_f220
- experiments: [dr6_pa4_f220, dr6_pa5_f150]
polarizations: *polarizations_pa4_f220
scales: *scales_pa4_f220
- experiments: [dr6_pa4_f220, dr6_pa6_f090]
polarizations: *polarizations_pa4_f220
scales: *scales_pa4_f220
- experiments: [dr6_pa4_f220, dr6_pa6_f150]
polarizations: *polarizations_pa4_f220
scales: *scales_pa4_f220
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f090, dr6_pa5_f090]
polarizations: *polarizations_auto
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [1000, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f090, dr6_pa5_f150]
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [1000, *lmax]
ET: [800, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f090, dr6_pa6_f090]
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [1000, *lmax]
ET: [1000, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f090, dr6_pa6_f150]
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [1000, *lmax]
ET: [600, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f150, dr6_pa5_f150]
polarizations: *polarizations_auto
scales:
TT: [800, *lmax]
TE: [800, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f150, dr6_pa6_f090]
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [800, *lmax]
ET: [1000, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa5_f150, dr6_pa6_f150]
scales:
TT: [800, *lmax]
TE: [800, *lmax]
ET: [600, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa6_f090, dr6_pa6_f090]
polarizations: *polarizations_auto
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [1000, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa6_f090, dr6_pa6_f150]
scales:
TT: [1000, *lmax]
TE: [1000, *lmax]
ET: [600, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax]
- experiments: [dr6_pa6_f150, dr6_pa6_f150]
polarizations: *polarizations_auto
scales:
TT: [600, *lmax]
TE: [600, *lmax]
EE: [500, *lmax] We can discuss the details on slack. |
I have addressed these changes in #9 in preparation for the sim runs. |
Updated the DR6 likelihood data cuts corresponding to the unblinding cuts: