Improve RFC 007 #125
Improve RFC 007 #125
Conversation
| </td> | ||
| </tr> | ||
| <tr> | ||
| <td colspan="3"><strong><code>id</code></strong> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not convinced on the need for this. Can you explain some use cases for it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The purpose of 'id' is for the bank to be able to keep track of when they have issued which PWA covering what funding source to the user.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
still not convinced why. They can do that already using iat and sub and information in the funding source.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, it's about convenience and the possibility for the bank to retrieve the context about this credential from their internal systems with a simple query across one column containing unique values. -- Would you be happier if we make 'id' optional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we rely on standard claim jti instead ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd be cool with optional jti
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agreed. I updated accordingly.
| <tr> | ||
| <td colspan="3"><strong><code>iss</code></strong> | ||
| </td> | ||
| <td>REQUIRED. Issuer of the credential. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would like to mention somewhere that these (and aud etc) are registered claims when using sd-jwt vc. I do like these being mentioned explicitly as they here though, to explain how we expect them to be used for a PWA.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sure, happy for you to go ahead and make a proposal.
This PR also addresses #118.