Fix operator equal application issue

[Jack251970]

Fix operator equal application issue for #3122

[gitstream-cm]

Be a legend 🏆 by adding a before and after screenshot of the changes you made, especially if they are around UI/UX.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the GetZOrder method within the FileExplorerHelper class. The change specifically alters the comparison logic used to find the index of a window handle in the hWnds list. The updated code converts x.HWND to an IntPtr for comparison with wnd, ensuring both sides of the comparison are of the same type. This adjustment aims to enhance the accuracy of window handle comparisons while maintaining the overall structure and logic of the method.

Changes

File	Change Summary
Flow.Launcher.Infrastructure/FileExplorerHelper.cs	Modified GetZOrder method to compare x.HWND as IntPtr with wnd, ensuring type-safe comparisons

Suggested labels

bug

Possibly related PRs

• Fix Copy Action Issue #3165: Changes in clipboard handling that may relate to the GetZOrder method's handling of window handles, as both involve interactions with system-level operations.

Poem

🐰 In the land of windows, a tweak was made,
A handle's dance in a type-safe parade.
With comparisons clear, no mismatches to fear,
The GetZOrder shines, bringing joy and good cheer!
Hooray for the code, let the rabbits all cheer! 🖥️

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5d62312 and 56069e6.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• Flow.Launcher.Infrastructure/FileExplorerHelper.cs (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• Flow.Launcher.Infrastructure/FileExplorerHelper.cs

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[taooceros]

Why does it compared as int64 not intptr

[github-actions]

@check-spelling-bot Report

🔴 Please review

See the 📂 files view, the 📜action log, or 📝 job summary for details.

❌ Errors	Count
❌ forbidden-pattern	22
❌ ignored-expect-variant	1
⚠️ non-alpha-in-dictionary	19

See ❌ Event descriptions for more information.

If the flagged items are 🤯 false positives

If items relate to a ...

• binary file (or some other file you wouldn't want to check at all).

  Please add a file path to the excludes.txt file matching the containing file.

  File paths are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your files.

  ^ refers to the file's path from the root of the repository, so ^README\.md$ would exclude README.md (on whichever branch you're using).

• well-formed pattern.

  If you can write a pattern that would match it,
  try adding it to the patterns.txt file.

  Patterns are Perl 5 Regular Expressions - you can test yours before committing to verify it will match your lines.

  Note that patterns can't match multiline strings.

[Jack251970]

Why does it compared as int64 not intptr

@taooceros Yeah, that makes sense. Now move to IntPtr comparision.

[taooceros]

I am traveling now so couldn't check this but isn't the value field is intptr?

[taooceros]

On the other hand I think for latest c# maybe nint is preferred over intptr? I am not totally sure though

[Jack251970]

@taooceros Sorry, I am confused with it.

Firstly, I can provide you all the types here: x.HWND is dynamic{long}, wnd is HWND and wnd.Value is IntPtr.

In the first version of my codes, I use long comparision: var searchIndex = hWnds.FindIndex(x => x.HWND == wnd.Value.ToInt64());.

Why does it compared as int64 not intptr

And you comment for IntPtr comparision? (Not sure if you really mean that)

So I use new IntPtr(x.HWND) to compare the IntPtr.

On the other hand I think for latest c# maybe nint is preferred over intptr? I am not totally sure though

And now you again ask me to compare with uint?

[Jack251970]

For me, var searchIndex = hWnds.FindIndex(x => x.HWND == wnd.Value.ToInt64()); and var searchIndex = hWnds.FindIndex(x => new IntPtr(x.HWND) == wnd); both can work well.

c# maybe nint is preferred over intptr

So, I should use the first version?

[taooceros]

nint actually (not uint). Search it. It is now an alias of intptr I believe.

[taooceros]

For me, var searchIndex = hWnds.FindIndex(x => x.HWND == wnd.Value.ToInt64()); and var searchIndex = hWnds.FindIndex(x => new IntPtr(x.HWND) == wnd); both can work well.

c# maybe nint is preferred over intptr

So, I should use the first version?

I think the current one is fine. Just curious why x.HWND is not the HWND type.

[Jack251970]

For me, var searchIndex = hWnds.FindIndex(x => x.HWND == wnd.Value.ToInt64()); and var searchIndex = hWnds.FindIndex(x => new IntPtr(x.HWND) == wnd); both can work well.

c# maybe nint is preferred over intptr

So, I should use the first version?

I think the current one is fine. Just curious why x.HWND is not the HWND type.

Thank you for clarifying. @jjw24 Please check.

[taooceros]

I just check and now I understand what's going on. Maybe later on we can change things to static type pinvoke.