Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add optional names for colocation groups #665

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rgrandl
Copy link
Contributor

@rgrandl rgrandl commented Oct 19, 2023

We've discussed in the past to enable the user to specify group names. Right now we compute automatically the group names as the name of the first component in each group.

This PR enables the user to specify group names (optionally). This is becoming more and more important given that we allow the user to configure various knobs in the deployer, and many knobs make sense for a particular colocation group. E.g., secrets/config maps make sense for colocation group. Maybe we will allow people to configure resource requirements per colocation group at some point, etc.

@rgrandl rgrandl force-pushed the add_optional_names_for_coloc_groups branch 2 times, most recently from db5a481 to 8480bb8 Compare October 19, 2023 00:39
We've discussed to enable the user to specify group names.
Right now we compute automatically the group names as the name of the
first component in each group.

This PR enables the user to specify group names (optionally). This is
becoming more and more important given that we allow the user to
configure various knobs in the deployer, and many knobs make sense for a
particular colocation group. E.g., secrets/config maps make sense for colocation
group. Maybe we will allow people to configure resource requirements per
colocation group at some point, etc.
@rgrandl rgrandl force-pushed the add_optional_names_for_coloc_groups branch from 8480bb8 to be31909 Compare October 19, 2023 00:40
@rgrandl rgrandl requested a review from spetrovic77 October 19, 2023 00:40
@rgrandl rgrandl closed this Nov 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant