Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #27 from DougBurke/prepare-0030
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Prepare for the 0.0.30 release
  • Loading branch information
DougBurke authored Oct 7, 2024
2 parents f06a62b + 830b124 commit 5b8afc4
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions.
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
Potential build improvements, including support for using the CXC
xspec-modelsonly conda package for providing XSPEC, updates to the
build infrastructure to use more-modern Python packaging techniques,
and (hopefully) support for the macOS platform.
and support for the macOS platform. I have added GitHub Actions to
run tests with Python 3.12 for Linux and macOS ARM systems.

## 0.0.26 - 0.0.29

Expand Down
7 changes: 4 additions & 3 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1372,8 +1372,8 @@ In [12]: %timeit y2 = x.bvapec_(energies=egrid2, pars=pars2, out=out2)
7.13 ms ± 26.3 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
```

So, for this simple case it doesn't seem worth usnig the `RealArray`
versino (but perhaps not returning the array and other changes could
So, for this simple case it doesn't seem worth using the `RealArray`
version (but perhaps not returning the array and other changes could
alter this).

# Convenience versus speed
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1423,4 +1423,5 @@ module does some of the following:
XSPEC 12.14.1 is 197 of the 293 models we support) are handled
using the C interface. To see if this is a problem I have added
(in version 0.0.24) the RealArray interface discussed above,
but it doesn't seem to make much difference.
but it doesn't seem to make much difference, although this claim
needs to be tested.

0 comments on commit 5b8afc4

Please sign in to comment.