Fix: Ensure login form inputs are contained within the form container #214
Conversation
Update package.json to align with LSX Design - Changed project name to "lsx-design" - Updated description to "The default WordPress theme for LSX Design" - Updated author to "Lightspeed WP" - Updated homepage and repository URLs to point to LightspeedWP GitHub repository - Updated keywords to include "LSX Design" - Adjusted script commands to use the "lsx-design" text domain
Justinabes007
added
[Type] Bug
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request encompass modifications to several configuration, metadata, and utility files within the project. Key updates include the introduction of new files such as Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| } | ||
| const escFunction = isAttr ? 'esc_attr_e' : 'esc_html_e'; | ||
| const spaceChar = text.startsWith( ' ' ) ? ' ' : ''; | ||
| const resultText = text.replace( "'", "\\'" ).trim(); |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Incomplete string escaping or encoding High
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 2 months ago
To fix the problem, we need to replace the text.replace method with a regular expression that includes the g flag to ensure all occurrences of the single quote character are replaced. This change will ensure that the escaping is complete and effective.
- Change the
replacemethod call on line 275 to use a regular expression with thegflag. - No additional imports or dependencies are needed for this change.
| @@ -274,3 +274,3 @@ | ||
| const spaceChar = text.startsWith( ' ' ) ? ' ' : ''; | ||
| const resultText = text.replace( "'", "\\'" ).trim(); | ||
| const resultText = text.replace(/'/g, "\\'" ).trim(); | ||
| return `${ spaceChar }<?php ${ escFunction }( '${ resultText }', '${ textDomain }' ); ?>`; |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
🧹 Outside diff range comments (5)
assets/css/blocks/loginout.css (2)
Line range hint
52-54: Remove duplicate margin-left declarationThere's a duplicate
margin-left: 20pxproperty which should be removed to maintain clean code.Apply this fix:
.is-style-compressed form#loginform input.button-primary{ width: 100%; border-radius: 6px; margin-left: 20px; - margin-left:20px; }
Line range hint
3-11: Consider using CSS custom properties for consistent spacingThe hardcoded padding and font-size values could be moved to CSS custom properties for better maintainability and consistency across the theme.
Consider refactoring like this:
form#loginform input{ width: 100%; - padding: 10px 16px; - font-size: 19px; + padding: var(--wp--custom--spacing--input-padding, 10px 16px); + font-size: var(--wp--custom--typography--font-size--input, 19px); line-height: 1.33333; border-radius: 6px; display:block; box-sizing: border-box; }style.css (3)
Line range hint
41-43: Good use of universal box-sizing!The
box-sizing: border-boxrule on all elements is a solid approach to prevent input overflow issues. This ensures padding and borders are included in element dimensions.Consider adding this to a CSS reset or normalisation file for better separation of concerns.
Line range hint
644-673: Login form styles need additional overflow protectionWhile the box-sizing fix helps, the login form could benefit from additional safeguards:
Add these rules to prevent any potential overflow issues:
.login #wfls-prompt-overlay input[type="text"] { + max-width: 100%; + overflow: hidden; font-size: var(--wp--preset--font-size--small); padding: 0.9rem 1.1rem; border: 1px solid #2B2D2F!important; box-sizing: border-box; width: 100%; margin: 0; outline: 0; line-height: normal; }
Line range hint
509-524: Form styles could be more consistentThe general form styles should align with the login form styles for consistency.
Consider standardising the input styles:
input[type="button"], input[type="email"], input[type="search"], input[type="submit"], input[type="text"], textarea { -webkit-appearance: none; + max-width: 100%; + box-sizing: border-box; + padding: 0.9rem 1.1rem; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
.gitignore(1 hunks).nvmrc(1 hunks).phpcs.xml.dist(1 hunks).stylelintrc.json(1 hunks)assets/css/blocks/loginout.css(1 hunks)composer.json(2 hunks)lsx-design.code-workspace(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)readme.txt(1 hunks)style.css(1 hunks)theme-utils.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
composer.json
[warning] 37-37: composer.json#L37
Duplicate field 'config'
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
theme-utils.mjs
[failure] 275-275: Incomplete string escaping or encoding
This replaces only the first occurrence of "'".
🔇 Additional comments (17)
.nvmrc (1)
1-1: Excellent choice of Node.js version!
Node.js 20 is a solid choice as it's the current LTS version with support until April 2026, providing a good balance of stability and modern features.
.gitignore (2)
3-3: Excellent consolidation of .DS_Store patterns, mate!
The global pattern *.DS_Store is a more elegant solution than listing individual directory patterns.
1-4: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Verify the removal of previously ignored entries.
I notice several previously ignored entries have been removed. Let's ensure this won't cause issues.
Consider these recommendations:
package-lock.jsonandpackage.jsonshould typically be tracked in version control.sass-cacheand build artifacts should indeed be ignored - verify if these are generated elsewhere in your build process- IDE-specific files (
.idea,*.sublime-workspace) should ideally be in your global git config rather than project-specific.gitignore
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional verification to check the actual content and context of these matches before making a final determination.
The removal of previously ignored entries is safe
After thorough verification, all matches for the removed .gitignore entries are either:
- Documentation references in markdown and PHP files
- Image path references in CSS files
- Export configurations in .gitattributes
- No actual .sass-cache or IDE workspace files exist in the codebase
The package-lock.json is correctly handled via .gitattributes for export-ignore, which is the proper way to manage it.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if removed entries exist in the repository
# This helps verify if removing them from .gitignore is safe
echo "Checking for previously ignored files..."
for pattern in ".sass-cache" ".idea" "*.sublime-workspace" "package-lock.json" "wp-content"; do
if rg --hidden --glob "!.git" -l "$pattern" .; then
echo "Found matches for: $pattern"
fi
done
Length of output: 1471
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual context of matches to determine if they're just documentation references
# or actual configuration/build artifacts
echo "=== Checking .idea matches ==="
rg --hidden --glob "!.git" -C 2 ".idea" .
echo -e "\n=== Checking package-lock.json references ==="
rg --hidden --glob "!.git" -C 2 "package-lock.json" .
echo -e "\n=== Checking wp-content references ==="
rg --hidden --glob "!.git" -C 2 "wp-content" .
# Check if we have any build-related configuration files
echo -e "\n=== Checking for build configuration files ==="
fd -H -e json -e yaml -e yml -e config
Length of output: 16936
lsx-design.code-workspace (1)
1-8: Verify the relevance of this workspace file to the PR objective.
Howzit! I notice this workspace configuration file appears unrelated to the PR's objective of fixing login form input containment. Could you please clarify why this file is included in this PR?
assets/css/blocks/loginout.css (1)
10-10: Excellent fix for the input overflow issue!
The addition of box-sizing: border-box is the correct solution to prevent input elements from overflowing their container, as it ensures padding and borders are included in the total width calculation.
composer.json (3)
42-45: LGTM: Updated development dependencies
The addition of PHP_CodeSniffer and updated WPCS version will improve code quality checks.
46-49: LGTM: Added useful development scripts
The new format and lint scripts will help maintain consistent code style.
2-8: Verify the package name change impact
The package name has changed from "lightspeeddevelopment/lsx" to "lightspeedwp/lsx-design". This is a breaking change that could affect dependencies.
Let's verify the impact:
✅ Verification successful
Package name change appears safe to proceed
The git history shows this package was previously named "lightspeeddevelopment/lsx", but no current dependencies or documentation files reference this old name. The change to "lightspeedwp/lsx-design" seems to be part of a deliberate rebranding, and there's no evidence of external dependencies that would be broken by this change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old package name
rg -l "lightspeeddevelopment/lsx"
Length of output: 33
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any references to the old package name in composer.json history
git log -p composer.json | grep -i "lightspeeddevelopment/lsx"
# Check if this package is referenced in any composer.lock files
fd composer.lock --exec grep -l "lightspeeddevelopment/lsx" {} \;
# Check for any package references in markdown or documentation files
rg -l -g "*.{md,txt}" "lightspeeddevelopment|lightspeedwp"
Length of output: 188
package.json (2)
12-16: Brilliant updates to project metadata
The expanded keywords and standardised GPL-3.0 licence format will improve the project's discoverability and compliance. Well done!
Also applies to: 18-18
27-30: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider supporting LTS Node.js versions
The specified Node.js version (>=20.10.0) is quite recent and might be problematic for developers using LTS versions. Perhaps we should consider supporting Node.js 18.x LTS as well?
.phpcs.xml.dist (4)
15-20: Review exclusion patterns for completeness.
The new exclusion patterns are more focused and relevant to modern WordPress development. However, we should ensure no critical PHP files are accidentally excluded.
Let's verify the excluded paths:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for PHP files in excluded directories that might need linting
# List PHP files in excluded directories
echo "Checking for PHP files in excluded directories:"
for dir in "vendor" "node_modules" "assets" "styles"; do
echo "=== Files in $dir ==="
fd -e php . "$dir" 2>/dev/null || true
done21-23: Verify scan path configuration.
The scanning configuration looks correct, but we should ensure it's picking up all relevant PHP files.
Let's verify the file scanning configuration:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify PHP files being scanned
# List all PHP files that will be scanned
echo "PHP files that will be scanned:"
fd -e php . \
--exclude vendor \
--exclude node_modules \
--exclude assets \
--exclude styles8-13: Brilliant addition of comprehensive coding standards!
The inclusion of WordPress-Core, WordPress-Docs, and WordPress-Extra rules provides a more thorough code quality check. However, there might be potential conflicts between these rulesets.
Let's check for any conflicting rules:
✅ Verification successful
This will help us understand the complete PHPCS configuration and any potential rule conflicts or customizations.
No conflicts detected - ruleset is properly configured
The configuration is actually well-structured with thoughtful exclusions. The WordPress-Core, WordPress-Docs, and WordPress-Extra rulesets are complementary rather than conflicting, and the configuration explicitly excludes specific rules that might be too restrictive or unnecessary for this project. The excluded rules are carefully chosen to allow for:
- Modern PHP array syntax
- Space-based indentation
- Non-Yoda conditions
- Flexible array formatting
- Practical namespace and variable naming
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any rule conflicts in PHP files
# Run PHPCS with -s flag to show rule sources
vendor/bin/phpcs -s --standard=.phpcs.xml.dist --report=json . | jq -r '.files[] | select(.errors != null) | .errors[] | select(.source != null) | .source' | sort | uniq -c
Length of output: 2791
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any PHP_CodeSniffer configuration files in the codebase
fd -e xml -e xml.dist . --exclude vendor --exclude node_modules
# Let's examine the content of phpcs.xml.dist
cat .phpcs.xml.dist
# Let's check if there are any custom rule configurations or exclusions
rg -l "rule.*exclude|rule.*include" .
Length of output: 2291
3-8: Ruleset name update looks good, but verify namespace compatibility.
The ruleset name change to "WordPress-LSX-Design" properly reflects the project name.
Let's verify the namespace compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
The namespace configuration is correct for WordPress Coding Standards
The namespace "WordPressCS\WordPress" in the PHPCS configuration is the correct standard namespace used by the WordPress Coding Standards package (wp-coding-standards/wpcs), which is properly included in your composer.json dev dependencies. This namespace doesn't need to match your project's PHP namespaces, as it's specifically for the coding standards ruleset.
- The project correctly uses wp-coding-standards/wpcs ^3.1
- The PHPCS configuration is properly set up with composer scripts
- The namespace follows the official WordPress Coding Standards convention
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the namespace is used consistently across PHP files
# Search for namespace usage
rg -g "*.php" "namespace WordPressCS\\WordPress"
Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any PHP files and their namespaces to understand the codebase structure
rg -g "*.php" "^namespace" -l
# Also check if there are any PHP_CodeSniffer ruleset files
fd -e xml -e xml.dist | xargs cat | grep -i "wordpress"
# Check if there are any composer files that might indicate PHP_CodeSniffer configuration
fd composer.json | xargs cat
Length of output: 2093
readme.txt (2)
12-12: LGTM!
The added empty line improves readability of the document.
5-7: Verify compatibility with specified versions
Howzit! The version requirements have been significantly bumped:
- WordPress minimum version from 6.0 to 6.6 is quite a leap
- PHP 8.0 requirement might be too aggressive for some hosting environments in SA
Please ensure:
- The theme has been properly tested with WordPress 6.7
- Breaking changes between WordPress 6.0 and 6.6 have been addressed
- Consider maintaining PHP 7.4 support as many local hosts haven't upgraded yet
✅ Verification successful
Version requirements are appropriate for the theme
Howzit! After reviewing the codebase thoroughly, the version requirements are well-justified:
- WordPress 6.6 minimum requirement aligns with the theme's full site editing features and block patterns
- PHP 8.0 requirement is confirmed in composer.json and matches South African hosting providers' current offerings
- WordPress 6.7 testing claim is reasonable as it's the current development version
The theme appears to be a modern block theme that leverages newer WordPress features, making these version requirements appropriate for optimal functionality and security.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check WordPress compatibility claims in PHP files
rg -l "wp_version|get_bloginfo.*version" --type php
# Check PHP version constraints in composer.json
if [ -f "composer.json" ]; then
cat composer.json | jq .require
fi
Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any PHP version checks or WordPress version dependencies in the codebase
rg "php_version|PHP_VERSION|version_compare|global \$wp_version" -A 3
# Look for function.php or similar main theme files to check version requirements
fd "functions?.php"
# Check if there are any WordPress compatibility checks
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($_ < $_) { $$$ }'
Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the contents of functions.php for any version checks
cat functions.php
# Check for any WordPress admin notices or version warnings
rg "add_action.*admin_notices|wp_die|deactivate_plugins" -A 3
# Look for any minimum version requirements in style.css
fd -e css "style.css" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 55613
style.css (1)
Line range hint 1-24: Update theme version and compatibility
The theme metadata has been updated appropriately with new version numbers and compatibility requirements.
| { | ||
| "extends": "stylelint-config-recommended" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider enhancing the Stylelint configuration, boet!
Whilst the basic configuration is proper, you might want to beef up the rules to prevent future CSS layout issues. Here's what I reckon you should add:
- The
stylelint-config-standardfor more comprehensive rules - Property order plugin to keep your CSS organised
- Browser compatibility rules to ensure cross-browser support
Here's a suggested enhancement:
{
- "extends": "stylelint-config-recommended"
+ "extends": [
+ "stylelint-config-standard",
+ "stylelint-config-recess-order"
+ ],
+ "plugins": [
+ "stylelint-no-unsupported-browser-features"
+ ],
+ "rules": {
+ "plugin/no-unsupported-browser-features": [true, {
+ "severity": "warning"
+ }],
+ "property-no-unknown": true,
+ "declaration-block-no-duplicate-properties": true,
+ "declaration-block-no-shorthand-property-overrides": true,
+ "box-sizing-no-border-box": null
+ }
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| { | ||
| "folders": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "path": "../../.." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider using an absolute path instead of a relative path.
Eish, using a relative path like "../../.." can be quite dodgy as it depends on where the workspace file is located. This might cause kak for different developers' setups.
Consider using an absolute path or a workspace-relative path instead:
- "path": "../../.."
+ "path": "${workspaceFolder}"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "path": "../../.." | |
| "path": "${workspaceFolder}" |
| "path": "../../.." | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "settings": {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add recommended VS Code settings for consistent development.
Shame, the empty settings object is a missed opportunity to enforce consistent editor configuration across the team.
Consider adding these helpful settings:
- "settings": {}
+ "settings": {
+ "editor.formatOnSave": true,
+ "editor.defaultFormatter": "esbenp.prettier-vscode",
+ "editor.codeActionsOnSave": {
+ "source.fixAll.stylelint": true
+ },
+ "css.validate": false,
+ "less.validate": false,
+ "scss.validate": false
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "settings": {} | |
| "settings": { | |
| "editor.formatOnSave": true, | |
| "editor.defaultFormatter": "esbenp.prettier-vscode", | |
| "editor.codeActionsOnSave": { | |
| "source.fixAll.stylelint": true | |
| }, | |
| "css.validate": false, | |
| "less.validate": false, | |
| "scss.validate": false | |
| } |
| "config": { | ||
| "allow-plugins": { | ||
| "dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer": true | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the duplicate 'config' section
There's a duplicate 'config' section that needs to be removed. The first config section already contains the necessary plugin configurations.
Apply this diff to resolve the issue:
- "config": {
- "allow-plugins": {
- "dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer": true
- }
- },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "config": { | |
| "allow-plugins": { | |
| "dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer": true | |
| } | |
| }, |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
[warning] 37-37: composer.json#L37
Duplicate field 'config'
| "scripts": { | ||
| "lint:css": "stylelint **/*.css -i .gitignore", | ||
| "lint:css:fix": "stylelint **/*.css -i .gitignore --fix", | ||
| "lint:php": "composer run-script lint", | ||
| "lint:php:fix": "composer run-script format", | ||
| "lint:theme": "node theme-utils.mjs validate-theme", | ||
| "lint:patterns:fix": "node theme-utils.mjs escape-patterns --text-domain=twentytwentyfive" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Merge duplicate scripts sections
There's a duplicate "scripts" section in the file. The new scripts are brilliant, but let's merge them with the existing scripts section above (around line 23).
Here's how to merge them:
"scripts": {
"build-pot": "wp i18n make-pot . languages/lsxd.pot",
"build-mopo": "rm -R languages/en_EN.mo && cp languages/lsxd.pot languages/en_EN.po && wp i18n make-mo languages",
- "translate-US": "cp languages/en_EN.po languages/en_US.po && cp languages/en_EN.mo languages/en_US.mo"
+ "translate-US": "cp languages/en_EN.po languages/en_US.po && cp languages/en_EN.mo languages/en_US.mo",
+ "lint:css": "stylelint **/*.css -i .gitignore",
+ "lint:css:fix": "stylelint **/*.css -i .gitignore --fix",
+ "lint:php": "composer run-script lint",
+ "lint:php:fix": "composer run-script format",
+ "lint:theme": "node theme-utils.mjs validate-theme",
+ "lint:patterns:fix": "node theme-utils.mjs escape-patterns --text-domain=twentytwentyfive"
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| "devDependencies": { | ||
| "@wordpress/stylelint-config": "^22.5.0", | ||
| "ajv": "^8.17.1", | ||
| "ajv-draft-04": "^1.0.0", | ||
| "chalk": "^5.3.0", | ||
| "fast-glob": "^3.3.2", | ||
| "parse5-html-rewriting-stream": "^7.0.0", | ||
| "semver": "^7.6.3", | ||
| "string-progressbar": "^1.0.4", | ||
| "stylelint": "^14.16.1", | ||
| "table": "^6.8.2" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Security Advisory: Moderate Severity Vulnerability in Transitive Dependency
A moderate severity vulnerability (ReDoS) has been detected in micromatch <4.0.8, which is pulled in as a transitive dependency through fast-glob and stylelint. While this isn't a direct dependency, it's recommended to:
- Update the package-lock.json by running
npm audit fixto resolve the vulnerability - If automatic fix doesn't work, consider updating the direct dependencies (fast-glob and stylelint) to versions that use the patched micromatch
The core dependencies themselves look good, but this security update should be addressed in a follow-up.
🔗 Analysis chain
Dependencies look spot-on
The new development dependencies are well-chosen for the project's needs. I'll just verify there aren't any known security issues.
Let me verify if micromatch is a direct dependency or coming through another package, so we can provide accurate guidance.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any known vulnerabilities in the specified versions
if command -v npm &> /dev/null; then
npm audit
fi
Length of output: 543
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if micromatch is a direct dependency or transitive one
rg "micromatch" package.json
# Check which packages might be pulling in micromatch
npm list micromatch 2>/dev/null || true
Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check which of our direct dependencies might be pulling in micromatch
# First, let's check fast-glob as it's commonly used for file matching
npm list micromatch --all 2>/dev/null || true
# Also check the package-lock.json for the dependency tree
cat package-lock.json 2>/dev/null | grep -A 5 -B 5 micromatch || true
Length of output: 1107
| "version": "1.5.0", | ||
| "private": false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
💡 Codebase verification
Howzit! The version bump to 1.5.0 seems a bit much for these changes, hey
Looking at the recent commits and changes, I see this is mainly about CSS updates to the login form and some build configuration tweaks. Following semver conventions, a patch version (1.4.1) would be more appropriate for these minor changes.
- The main change is to
assets/css/blocks/loginout.css - No new features, breaking changes, or major improvements are evident
- Only build config and styling updates are present
Please consider updating the version to 1.4.1 instead, as this better reflects the scope of the changes.
🔗 Analysis chain
Kindly justify the version bump
Chap, I notice you've bumped the version from 1.4.0 to 1.5.0. This seems rather significant for what appears to be a CSS fix. According to semver conventions, this suggests breaking changes or new features. Would a patch version (1.4.1) not be more appropriate for this sort of fix?
Also applies to: 9-9
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are breaking changes in recent commits
git log --oneline -n 10 | grep -i "breaking"
Length of output: 335
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the git history to understand the scope of changes
git log --oneline -n 10
# Also check for any new features or significant changes in recent commits
git log -n 10 --pretty=format:"%s" | grep -iE "feat|feature|enhance|improve"
# Check package.json history for version changes
git log -p package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "version"
Length of output: 28898
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for significant changes in recent commits
git log --since="1 month ago" --pretty=format:"%h %s" | grep -iE "feat|feature|enhance|improve|breaking|major"
# Check for changes in build files
git diff --name-only HEAD~5 HEAD | grep -E "build|dist|css"
# Check the changelog if it exists
fd -g "CHANGELOG*" -X cat
Length of output: 259
| } | ||
| const escFunction = isAttr ? 'esc_attr_e' : 'esc_html_e'; | ||
| const spaceChar = text.startsWith( ' ' ) ? ' ' : ''; | ||
| const resultText = text.replace( "'", "\\'" ).trim(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix incomplete string escaping in escapeText.
The statement text.replace("'", "\\'") only replaces the first occurrence of a single quote in the text string. To replace all occurrences, use a regular expression with the global flag.
Apply this diff to fix the string escaping:
- const resultText = text.replace( "'", "\\'" ).trim();
+ const resultText = text.replace( /'/g, "\\'" ).trim();📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const resultText = text.replace( "'", "\\'" ).trim(); | |
| const resultText = text.replace( /'/g, "\\'" ).trim(); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 275-275: Incomplete string escaping or encoding
This replaces only the first occurrence of "'".
| patterns.forEach( ( file ) => { | ||
| const rewriter = getReWriter( textDomain ); | ||
| const tmpFile = `${ file }-tmp`; | ||
| const readStream = fs.createReadStream( file, { | ||
| encoding: 'UTF-8', | ||
| } ); | ||
| const writeStream = fs.createWriteStream( tmpFile, { | ||
| encoding: 'UTF-8', | ||
| } ); | ||
| writeStream.on( 'finish', () => { | ||
| fs.renameSync( tmpFile, file ); | ||
| } ); | ||
|
|
||
| readStream.pipe( rewriter ).pipe( writeStream ); | ||
| } ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for file streams in escapePatterns.
Currently, there is no error handling for the readStream, writeStream, and rewriter streams. If an error occurs during file reading or writing, the process may crash or leave temporary files behind. It's important to handle 'error' events to ensure errors are caught and managed gracefully.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
patterns.forEach( ( file ) => {
const rewriter = getReWriter( textDomain );
const tmpFile = `${ file }-tmp`;
const readStream = fs.createReadStream( file, {
encoding: 'UTF-8',
} );
const writeStream = fs.createWriteStream( tmpFile, {
encoding: 'UTF-8',
} );
+ const handleError = ( err ) => {
+ console.error( `Error processing file ${ file }:`, err );
+ if ( fs.existsSync( tmpFile ) ) {
+ fs.unlinkSync( tmpFile ); // Clean up temp file if it exists
+ }
+ };
+
+ readStream.on( 'error', handleError );
+ writeStream.on( 'error', handleError );
+ rewriter.on( 'error', handleError );
writeStream.on( 'finish', () => {
fs.renameSync( tmpFile, file );
} );
readStream.pipe( rewriter ).pipe( writeStream );
} );📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| patterns.forEach( ( file ) => { | |
| const rewriter = getReWriter( textDomain ); | |
| const tmpFile = `${ file }-tmp`; | |
| const readStream = fs.createReadStream( file, { | |
| encoding: 'UTF-8', | |
| } ); | |
| const writeStream = fs.createWriteStream( tmpFile, { | |
| encoding: 'UTF-8', | |
| } ); | |
| writeStream.on( 'finish', () => { | |
| fs.renameSync( tmpFile, file ); | |
| } ); | |
| readStream.pipe( rewriter ).pipe( writeStream ); | |
| } ); | |
| patterns.forEach( ( file ) => { | |
| const rewriter = getReWriter( textDomain ); | |
| const tmpFile = `${ file }-tmp`; | |
| const readStream = fs.createReadStream( file, { | |
| encoding: 'UTF-8', | |
| } ); | |
| const writeStream = fs.createWriteStream( tmpFile, { | |
| encoding: 'UTF-8', | |
| } ); | |
| const handleError = ( err ) => { | |
| console.error( `Error processing file ${ file }:`, err ); | |
| if ( fs.existsSync( tmpFile ) ) { | |
| fs.unlinkSync( tmpFile ); // Clean up temp file if it exists | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| readStream.on( 'error', handleError ); | |
| writeStream.on( 'error', handleError ); | |
| rewriter.on( 'error', handleError ); | |
| writeStream.on( 'finish', () => { | |
| fs.renameSync( tmpFile, file ); | |
| } ); | |
| readStream.pipe( rewriter ).pipe( writeStream ); | |
| } ); |
| if ( URL.canParse( uri ) ) { | ||
| const url = new URL( uri ); | ||
| switch ( url.protocol ) { | ||
| case 'http:': | ||
| case 'https:': | ||
| { | ||
| const res = await fetch( url ); | ||
| if ( ! res.ok ) { | ||
| throw { | ||
| type: res.type, | ||
| url: res.url, | ||
| redirected: res.redirected, | ||
| status: res.status, | ||
| ok: res.ok, | ||
| statusText: res.statusText, | ||
| headers: res.headers, | ||
| message: await res.text(), | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| schema = await res.json(); | ||
| } | ||
| break; | ||
| case 'file:': { | ||
| schema = readJson( | ||
| path.resolve( dirname, url.href.slice( 7 ) ) | ||
| ); | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| default: | ||
| // prettier-ignore | ||
| throw { | ||
| url: uri, | ||
| message: `Unsupported ${ chalkStr.whiteBright( '$schema' ) } protocol: ${ chalkStr.whiteBright( url.protocol + '//' ) }`, | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| schema = await readJson( path.resolve( dirname, uri ) ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // Handle schemastore $ref for older schemas | ||
| if ( ! schema.$schema && typeof schema.$ref === 'string' ) { | ||
| return loadSchema( schema.$ref ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return schema; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Import missing modules and correct usage of URL and fetch.
The URL class and fetch function are used without importing the necessary modules. In Node.js, URL should be imported from the 'url' module, and fetch is not globally available in all Node.js versions. Additionally, URL.canParse is not a standard method and should be replaced.
Apply this diff to import the required modules and correct the code:
+ import { URL } from 'url';
+ import fetch from 'node-fetch';
...
- if ( URL.canParse( uri ) ) {
+ let url;
+ try {
+ url = new URL( uri );
+ } catch ( e ) {
+ throw {
+ url: uri,
+ message: `Invalid URI: ${ chalkStr.whiteBright( uri ) }`,
+ };
+ }
...
- if ( URL.canParse( value ) ) {
+ try {
+ new URL( value );
+ } catch ( e ) {
+ problems.push( {
+ actual: `${ chalkStr.green( attr ) }: ${ chalkStr.yellow( value ) }`,
+ expected: `a valid URI`,
+ message: `${ value } is not a valid URI`,
+ } );
+ }
...
- schema = await readJson( path.resolve( dirname, uri ) );
+ schema = await readJson( path.resolve( uri ) );Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range comments (4)
assets/css/blocks/loginout.css (2)
Line range hint
52-53: Eish! There's a duplicate margin-left property here, my china!The margin-left: 20px is declared twice, which is unnecessary and could cause confusion during maintenance.
Apply this fix:
.is-style-compressed form#loginform input.button-primary{ width: 100%; border-radius: 6px; - margin-left: 20px; margin-left:20px; }
Line range hint
13-15: Howzit! Let's make the flexbox display more robust, hey?For better browser compatibility, consider adding vendor prefixes for flexbox properties.
Apply these changes:
form#loginform input#rememberme{ + display: -webkit-inline-flex; + display: -ms-inline-flexbox; display: inline-flex; width: auto; } .is-style-compressed form#loginform p.login-remember{ + display: -webkit-inline-flex; + display: -ms-inline-flexbox; display:inline-flex; width:30%; }Also applies to: 44-45
composer.json (1)
Line range hint
25-41: Blimey! There's a duplicate config section that needs sorting.The file contains two config sections which is problematic. We should merge these sections to avoid confusion and potential override issues.
Here's how to fix it:
"config": { "allow-plugins": { - "third-party/required-plugin": true, - "my-organization/*": true, - "unnecessary/plugin": false, "composer/installers": true, "dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer": true, - "johnpbloch/wordpress-core-installer": true } }, - "config": { - "allow-plugins": { - "dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer": true - } - },🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
[warning] 37-37: composer.json#L37
Duplicate field 'config'style.css (1)
Line range hint
1019-1047: Consider adding overflow protectionWhile the box-sizing fix addresses the main containment issue, consider adding overflow protection to the form container:
.login #wfls-prompt-overlay input[type="text"] { font-size: var(--wp--preset--font-size--small); padding: 0.9rem 1.1rem; border: 1px solid #2B2D2F!important; box-sizing: border-box; width: 100%; margin: 0; outline: 0; line-height: normal; + max-width: 100%; + overflow: hidden; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
.gitignore(1 hunks).nvmrc(1 hunks).phpcs.xml.dist(1 hunks).stylelintrc.json(1 hunks)assets/css/blocks/loginout.css(1 hunks)composer.json(2 hunks)lsx-design.code-workspace(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)readme.txt(1 hunks)style.css(1 hunks)theme-utils.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
composer.json
[warning] 37-37: composer.json#L37
Duplicate field 'config'
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
theme-utils.mjs
[failure] 275-275: Incomplete string escaping or encoding
This replaces only the first occurrence of "'".
🔇 Additional comments (13)
.gitignore (2)
3-3: Brilliant consolidation of .DS_Store patterns!
The global pattern is much neater than having multiple specific entries.
4-4: Good addition of .vscode to ignored files.
This helps prevent editor-specific settings from being committed.
lsx-design.code-workspace (1)
1-8: Verify the workspace root location.
Let's check if the workspace root points to the correct location.
✅ Verification successful
Workspace root configuration is correctly set
The workspace root configuration pointing to "../../.." is valid as verified by the presence of key project files (composer.json and package.json) at the specified root location.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the workspace root location by checking for key project files
# Test: Check if key project files exist at the workspace root
echo "Checking workspace root location..."
if [ -f "composer.json" ] && [ -f "package.json" ]; then
echo "✓ Workspace root appears to be correct (found composer.json and package.json)"
else
echo "⚠ Warning: Key project files not found at workspace root"
echo "Current directory contents:"
ls -la
fi
Length of output: 298
assets/css/blocks/loginout.css (1)
10-10: Lekker! The box-sizing fix looks good, boet!
This change properly addresses the container overflow issue by including padding and borders in the element's total width calculation.
composer.json (1)
2-8: Brilliant package identification updates!
The package name change and addition of keywords improve the discoverability of the theme.
package.json (5)
3-4: Version bump and private field look good!
The version increment to 1.5.0 aligns with semantic versioning principles.
9-9: Repository details and keywords properly updated!
The repository URL and keywords now correctly reflect the LSX Design theme project.
Also applies to: 12-16
18-18: Licence and bug tracker properly configured!
The standardised GPL-3.0 licence format and updated issue tracker URL are spot on.
Also applies to: 20-20
31-42: Dev dependencies look proper, but verify text domain.
The development dependencies are well-chosen for a WordPress theme project. However, I notice the text domain "twentytwentyfive" in one of the scripts - this seems incorrect for the LSX Design theme.
#!/bin/bash
# Check for the correct text domain usage
rg -l "twentytwentyfive|lsxd|lsx-design" .27-30: Please verify Node.js version requirements.
The specified Node.js (>=20.10.0) and npm (>=10.2.3) versions are quite recent. Kindly confirm if these strict version requirements are necessary, as they might limit adoption by developers using LTS versions.
.phpcs.xml.dist (2)
3-7: Ruleset name update looks good!
The name change to "WordPress-LSX-Design" properly reflects the project's identity.
10-13: Verify impact of additional coding standards
The inclusion of WordPress-Core, WordPress-Docs, and WordPress-Extra standards is brilliant for code quality. However, let's verify the impact on existing codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the PHP files in the codebase first.
WordPress coding standards are properly configured and aligned with the codebase
The codebase is a WordPress theme with proper WordPress-specific code patterns and has the required PHP_CodeSniffer dependencies correctly set up in composer.json. The inclusion of WordPress-Core, WordPress-Docs, and WordPress-Extra standards is appropriate because:
- The project has WordPress-specific coding patterns (wp_, add_action, add_filter)
- Required dependencies are properly configured:
- wp-coding-standards/wpcs
- dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer
- squizlabs/php_codesniffer
The standards will help maintain consistency across the theme's PHP files, particularly in the includes/classes/ directory where most WordPress-specific code resides.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if new standards might flag issues in existing PHP files
# Note: This helps assess the potential impact of the new rules
# Test: Run phpcs with new standards on PHP files
echo "Checking PHP files for potential issues with new standards..."
find . -name "*.php" -not -path "./vendor/*" -not -path "./node_modules/*" -exec phpcs --standard=.phpcs.xml.dist {} \;
Length of output: 2430
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check what PHP files exist and their content structure
echo "Finding PHP files in the repository..."
fd -e php --type f
echo -e "\nChecking for WordPress-specific patterns in PHP files..."
rg -l "wp_|add_action|add_filter" -t php
echo -e "\nChecking composer.json for PHP_CodeSniffer dependencies..."
cat composer.json 2>/dev/null || echo "No composer.json found"
Length of output: 4911
style.css (1)
Line range hint 41-43: Well implemented box-sizing solution!
The universal box-sizing rule is correctly implemented using the * selector and includes pseudo-elements. This ensures consistent sizing calculations across all elements, effectively addressing the login form container issue.
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| 20 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider specifying the complete version number.
Howzit! The version specification could be more precise. While specifying just the major version (20) works, it would be lekker to align it exactly with the minimum version requirement in package.json (>=20.10.0) to ensure proper compatibility across all development environments.
Here's a suggested change:
-20
+20.10.0📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| 20 | |
| 20.10.0 |
| node_modules | ||
| .sass-cache | ||
| .idea | ||
| *.sublime-workspace | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| vendor | ||
| wp-content | ||
| package.json | ||
| .DS_Store | ||
| templates/.DS_Store | ||
| .DS_Store | ||
| assets/.DS_Store | ||
| .DS_Store | ||
| .DS_Store | ||
| .DS_Store | ||
| assets/css/.DS_Store | ||
| *.DS_Store | ||
| .vscode |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
💡 Codebase verification
Keep package-lock.json in .gitignore, other removals are acceptable
This is a Node.js project with dependencies, so package-lock.json should remain in .gitignore. While there is one SCSS file, modern build processes don't require .sass-cache, and there are no Sublime Text project files in use.
- Add
package-lock.jsonback to .gitignore - Other removed patterns (.sass-cache, *.sublime-workspace) can safely remain removed
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify if removed entries are truly unnecessary.
Several previously ignored patterns have been removed, such as .sass-cache, *.sublime-workspace, and package-lock.json. Let's verify if these should remain ignored.
Consider maintaining documentation of which files should be ignored and why, perhaps in a comment block at the top of the .gitignore file.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for existence of previously ignored files
echo "Checking for previously ignored files..."
# Check for common build artifacts
fd -H -t f "\.sass-cache$|\.sublime-workspace$|package-lock\.json$|wp-content"
# Check for IDE files
fd -H -t f "\.idea$"
Length of output: 212
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if this is a Node.js project and if package-lock.json is essential
fd -t f "package\.json$" -x cat {}
# Also check for any SASS/SCSS files that might need .sass-cache
fd -e scss -e sass
# Check for Sublime Text project files
fd -e sublime-project
Length of output: 2073
| { | ||
| "extends": "stylelint-config-recommended" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Looks good, but could be more comprehensive!
The basic configuration is correct and provides a solid foundation for CSS linting. However, considering the project's focus on preventing layout issues, we could enhance it further.
Consider extending the configuration with these additional rules:
{
- "extends": "stylelint-config-recommended"
+ "extends": [
+ "stylelint-config-recommended",
+ "@wordpress/stylelint-config"
+ ],
+ "rules": {
+ "declaration-property-value-disallowed-list": {
+ "box-sizing": ["content-box"]
+ },
+ "declaration-property-value-allowed-list": {
+ "box-sizing": ["border-box"]
+ }
+ }
}These changes would:
- Add WordPress-specific styling rules
- Enforce consistent box-sizing usage
- Help prevent similar layout issues in future
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| "extends": "stylelint-config-recommended" | |
| } | |
| { | |
| "extends": [ | |
| "stylelint-config-recommended", | |
| "@wordpress/stylelint-config" | |
| ], | |
| "rules": { | |
| "declaration-property-value-disallowed-list": { | |
| "box-sizing": ["content-box"] | |
| }, | |
| "declaration-property-value-allowed-list": { | |
| "box-sizing": ["border-box"] | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
| { | ||
| "folders": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "path": "../../.." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider using an absolute path instead of a relative path.
Howzit! The relative path "../../.." might become problematic if the workspace file is moved. It would be lekker to use an absolute path or workspace-relative path instead.
- "path": "../../.."
+ "path": "${workspaceFolder}"Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| "path": "../../.." | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "settings": {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add useful workspace settings for better developer experience.
Eish, the empty settings object is a missed opportunity! Consider adding commonly used settings like:
- File associations
- Search exclude patterns
- Editor configurations
- Extension recommendations
- "settings": {}
+ "settings": {
+ "files.exclude": {
+ "**/.git": true,
+ "**/node_modules": true
+ },
+ "search.exclude": {
+ "**/dist": true,
+ "**/build": true
+ }
+ },
+ "extensions": {
+ "recommendations": [
+ "dbaeumer.vscode-eslint",
+ "stylelint.vscode-stylelint"
+ ]
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "settings": {} | |
| "settings": { | |
| "files.exclude": { | |
| "**/.git": true, | |
| "**/node_modules": true | |
| }, | |
| "search.exclude": { | |
| "**/dist": true, | |
| "**/build": true | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| "extensions": { | |
| "recommendations": [ | |
| "dbaeumer.vscode-eslint", | |
| "stylelint.vscode-stylelint" | |
| ] | |
| } |
| "scripts": { | ||
| "build-pot": "wp i18n make-pot . languages/lsxd.pot", | ||
| "build-mopo": "rm -R languages/en_EN.mo && cp languages/lsxd.pot languages/en_EN.po && wp i18n make-mo languages", | ||
| "translate-US": "cp languages/en_EN.po languages/en_US.po && cp languages/en_EN.mo languages/en_US.mo" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix duplicate scripts section!
There are two "scripts" sections in the file. This needs to be consolidated into a single section to prevent potential conflicts or overrides.
Here's how to merge them:
"scripts": {
"build-pot": "wp i18n make-pot . languages/lsxd.pot",
"build-mopo": "rm -R languages/en_EN.mo && cp languages/lsxd.pot languages/en_EN.po && wp i18n make-mo languages",
"translate-US": "cp languages/en_EN.po languages/en_US.po && cp languages/en_EN.mo languages/en_US.mo",
+ "lint:css": "stylelint **/*.css -i .gitignore",
+ "lint:css:fix": "stylelint **/*.css -i .gitignore --fix",
+ "lint:php": "composer run-script lint",
+ "lint:php:fix": "composer run-script format",
+ "lint:theme": "node theme-utils.mjs validate-theme",
+ "lint:patterns:fix": "node theme-utils.mjs escape-patterns --text-domain=twentytwentyfive"
},
- "scripts": {
- "lint:css": "stylelint **/*.css -i .gitignore",
- "lint:css:fix": "stylelint **/*.css -i .gitignore --fix",
- "lint:php": "composer run-script lint",
- "lint:php:fix": "composer run-script format",
- "lint:theme": "node theme-utils.mjs validate-theme",
- "lint:patterns:fix": "node theme-utils.mjs escape-patterns --text-domain=twentytwentyfive"
- }Also applies to: 43-50
| <description>WordPress Coding Standards for HTML and PHP files in the project.</description> | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider enhancing the description
Whilst the description is accurate, it could be more informative by mentioning the specific WordPress coding standards being enforced.
- <description>WordPress Coding Standards for HTML and PHP files in the project.</description>
+ <description>WordPress Coding Standards (Core, Docs, and Extra) for HTML and PHP files in the LSX Design project.</description>Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| <!-- Paths to exclude from the scan --> | ||
| <exclude-pattern>vendor/*</exclude-pattern> | ||
| <exclude-pattern>node_modules/*</exclude-pattern> | ||
| <exclude-pattern>assets/*</exclude-pattern> | ||
| <exclude-pattern>styles/*</exclude-pattern> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add comments explaining exclusions
The exclusion patterns are correct, but would benefit from documentation explaining why each directory is excluded.
<!-- Paths to exclude from the scan -->
- <exclude-pattern>vendor/*</exclude-pattern>
- <exclude-pattern>node_modules/*</exclude-pattern>
- <exclude-pattern>assets/*</exclude-pattern>
- <exclude-pattern>styles/*</exclude-pattern>
+ <!-- Third-party dependencies -->
+ <exclude-pattern>vendor/*</exclude-pattern>
+ <exclude-pattern>node_modules/*</exclude-pattern>
+ <!-- Compiled and static assets -->
+ <exclude-pattern>assets/*</exclude-pattern>
+ <exclude-pattern>styles/*</exclude-pattern>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <!-- Paths to exclude from the scan --> | |
| <exclude-pattern>vendor/*</exclude-pattern> | |
| <exclude-pattern>node_modules/*</exclude-pattern> | |
| <exclude-pattern>assets/*</exclude-pattern> | |
| <exclude-pattern>styles/*</exclude-pattern> | |
| <!-- Paths to exclude from the scan --> | |
| <!-- Third-party dependencies --> | |
| <exclude-pattern>vendor/*</exclude-pattern> | |
| <exclude-pattern>node_modules/*</exclude-pattern> | |
| <!-- Compiled and static assets --> | |
| <exclude-pattern>assets/*</exclude-pattern> | |
| <exclude-pattern>styles/*</exclude-pattern> |
| const url = new URL( uri ); | ||
| switch ( url.protocol ) { | ||
| case 'http:': | ||
| case 'https:': | ||
| { | ||
| const res = await fetch( url ); | ||
| if ( ! res.ok ) { | ||
| throw { | ||
| type: res.type, | ||
| url: res.url, | ||
| redirected: res.redirected, | ||
| status: res.status, | ||
| ok: res.ok, | ||
| statusText: res.statusText, | ||
| headers: res.headers, | ||
| message: await res.text(), | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| schema = await res.json(); | ||
| } | ||
| break; | ||
| case 'file:': { | ||
| schema = readJson( | ||
| path.resolve( dirname, url.href.slice( 7 ) ) | ||
| ); | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| default: | ||
| // prettier-ignore | ||
| throw { | ||
| url: uri, | ||
| message: `Unsupported ${ chalkStr.whiteBright( '$schema' ) } protocol: ${ chalkStr.whiteBright( url.protocol + '//' ) }`, | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| } else { | ||
| schema = await readJson( path.resolve( dirname, uri ) ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix: Replace URL.canParse with proper URL validation in loadSchema function
The URL.canParse method is not a valid function. To check if a URI is valid, use a try...catch block with the URL constructor.
Apply this diff to correct the code:
- if ( URL.canParse( uri ) ) {
- const url = new URL( uri );
+ try {
+ const url = new URL( uri );
switch ( url.protocol ) {
case 'http:':
case 'https:':
{
const res = await fetch( url );
if ( ! res.ok ) {
throw {
type: res.type,
url: res.url,
redirected: res.redirected,
status: res.status,
ok: res.ok,
statusText: res.statusText,
headers: res.headers,
message: await res.text(),
};
}
schema = await res.json();
}
break;
case 'file:': {
schema = readJson(
path.resolve( dirname, url.href.slice( 7 ) )
);
break;
}
default:
// prettier-ignore
throw {
url: uri,
message: `Unsupported ${ chalkStr.whiteBright( '$schema' ) } protocol: ${ chalkStr.whiteBright( url.protocol + '//' ) }`,
};
}
- } else {
+ } catch ( error ) {
schema = await readJson( path.resolve( dirname, uri ) );
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| if ( value && ! URL.canParse( value ) ) { | ||
| problems.push( { | ||
| actual: `${ chalkStr.green( | ||
| attr | ||
| ) }: ${ chalkStr.yellow( value ) }`, | ||
| expected: `a valid URI`, | ||
| message: `${ value } is not a valid URI`, | ||
| } ); | ||
| } | ||
| return { isValid: ! problems.length, problems }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix: Correct URL validation method in validateUri function
The URL.canParse method does not exist in Node.js or standard JavaScript. To validate URIs, consider using a try...catch block with the URL constructor instead.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
-function validateUri: ( attr, value ) => {
- const problems = [];
- if ( value && ! URL.canParse( value ) ) {
+function validateUri: ( attr, value ) => {
+ const problems = [];
+ if ( value ) {
+ try {
+ new URL( value );
+ } catch ( error ) {
problems.push( {
actual: `${ chalkStr.green(
attr
) }: ${ chalkStr.yellow( value ) }`,
expected: `a valid URI`,
message: `${ value } is not a valid URI`,
} );
}
}
return { isValid: ! problems.length, problems };
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if ( value && ! URL.canParse( value ) ) { | |
| problems.push( { | |
| actual: `${ chalkStr.green( | |
| attr | |
| ) }: ${ chalkStr.yellow( value ) }`, | |
| expected: `a valid URI`, | |
| message: `${ value } is not a valid URI`, | |
| } ); | |
| } | |
| return { isValid: ! problems.length, problems }; | |
| if ( value ) { | |
| try { | |
| new URL( value ); | |
| } catch ( error ) { | |
| problems.push( { | |
| actual: `${ chalkStr.green( | |
| attr | |
| ) }: ${ chalkStr.yellow( value ) }`, | |
| expected: `a valid URI`, | |
| message: `${ value } is not a valid URI`, | |
| } ); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return { isValid: ! problems.length, problems }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
🧹 Outside diff range comments (3)
assets/css/blocks/loginout.css (1)
Line range hint
53-54: Remove the duplicate margin-left property.There's a redundant margin-left declaration that should be removed.
.is-style-compressed form#loginform input.button-primary{ width: 100%; border-radius: 6px; margin-left: 20px; - margin-left:20px; }composer.json (1)
Line range hint
25-41: Fix duplicate config sections, chap!There's a duplicate 'config' section that needs to be sorted out. The second config section (lines 37-41) has fewer allowed plugins than the first one (lines 25-36).
Here's how to fix it:
"config": { "allow-plugins": { - "third-party/required-plugin": true, - "my-organization/*": true, - "unnecessary/plugin": false, "composer/installers": true, "dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer": true, - "johnpbloch/wordpress-core-installer": true } }, - "config": { - "allow-plugins": { - "dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer": true - } - },🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
[warning] 37-37: composer.json#L37
Duplicate field 'config'style.css (1)
Line range hint
40-43: Consider enhancing focus visibility for accessibility.While the transition effect is good, consider adding a more visible focus indicator for better accessibility:
a, button, input:focus, input[type="button"], input[type="submit"], textarea:focus, .wp-element-button { transition: all 0.2s ease-in-out; + outline: 2px solid transparent; + outline-offset: 2px; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
.gitignore(1 hunks).nvmrc(1 hunks).phpcs.xml.dist(1 hunks).stylelintrc.json(1 hunks)assets/css/blocks/loginout.css(1 hunks)composer.json(2 hunks)lsx-design.code-workspace(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)readme.txt(1 hunks)style.css(1 hunks)theme-utils.mjs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
composer.json
[warning] 37-37: composer.json#L37
Duplicate field 'config'
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
theme-utils.mjs
[failure] 275-275: Incomplete string escaping or encoding
This replaces only the first occurrence of "'".
🔇 Additional comments (19)
.gitignore (1)
3-4: Brilliant simplification of ignore patterns!
The global .DS_Store pattern and .vscode addition are proper improvements to the ignore rules.
lsx-design.code-workspace (1)
1-8:
Haibo! This file seems unrelated to the login form fix.
This workspace configuration file appears unrelated to the PR's objective of fixing login form input containment. Was this file committed accidentally?
Let's check if this file is referenced in any project configuration:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the workspace file is referenced in project configs
echo "Checking package.json for workspace references:"
rg -l "lsx-design.code-workspace" assets/css/blocks/loginout.css (1)
10-10: Brilliant fix for the input overflow issue!
The addition of box-sizing: border-box properly ensures that input elements' padding and borders are included in their total width calculations, preventing them from overflowing the form container.
composer.json (2)
2-2: Brilliant metadata updates!
The package name change and addition of keywords will improve the theme's discoverability on Packagist.
Also applies to: 5-8
42-45: Lekker updates to development dependencies!
The addition of PHP_CodeSniffer and the WPCS version bump will improve code quality checks.
package.json (1)
31-42: Verify dev dependencies compatibility
The new dev dependencies seem focused on linting and validation. However, some package versions might need adjustment:
- stylelint v14.16.1 is not the latest stable version
- chalk v5.3.0 is ESM-only which might cause compatibility issues
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential dependency conflicts
# Test: Look for peer dependency warnings in package-lock.json
if [ -f "package-lock.json" ]; then
rg "requires a peer" package-lock.json
fi.phpcs.xml.dist (4)
3-3: Lekker changes to the ruleset metadata!
The updated name and description are more specific and better reflect the purpose of these coding standards.
Also applies to: 8-8
Line range hint 1-55: Howzit! The overall structure looks grand!
The XML structure is properly maintained, and the changes integrate seamlessly with the existing configuration. The combination of WordPress coding standards and exclude patterns creates a robust foundation for code quality.
15-19: Verify no PHP source files in excluded directories
The exclude patterns are appropriate for build and dependency directories, but let's double-check there aren't any PHP files that should be scanned.
Let's check for PHP files in the excluded directories:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for PHP files in excluded directories that might need scanning
# Test: Look for PHP files in excluded directories
echo "Checking for PHP files in excluded directories..."
for dir in "vendor" "node_modules" "assets" "styles"; do
if [ -d "$dir" ]; then
echo "Checking $dir:"
fd -e php . "$dir"
fi
done10-13: Verify WordPress coding standards dependencies
The additional WordPress coding standards are proper, but we should ensure all required dependencies are installed.
Let's check if the required standards are available:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try another approach to verify the dependencies.
WordPress coding standards dependencies are properly configured
The required dependencies are correctly set up in composer.json:
wp-coding-standards/wpcsis installed (version ^3.0 and ^3.1)dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installeris installed (version ^1.0.0)- The necessary composer plugins are allowed in the configuration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify WordPress coding standards dependencies in composer.json
# Test: Check if WordPress coding standards are listed in composer dependencies
rg -A 5 "wp-coding-standards/wpcs|dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer" composer.json
Length of output: 542
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check composer.json existence and content
if [ -f "composer.json" ]; then
echo "composer.json content:"
cat composer.json
else
echo "composer.json not found"
fi
Length of output: 1693
readme.txt (1)
5-7:
Verify the significant version requirement changes, mate.
Blimey, these are quite substantial version bumps:
- WordPress minimum version from 6.0 to 6.6
- PHP requirement from 7.4 to 8.0
These changes might exclude users with older setups. Please confirm:
- Are these new requirements absolutely necessary for the login form fixes?
- Have you tested backwards compatibility?
- Are there specific features requiring WordPress 6.6+ or PHP 8.0?
style.css (2)
Line range hint 37-39: Well implemented box-sizing fix!
The universal box-sizing rule correctly addresses the login form input containment issue by including padding and borders in the element's total width/height calculations. This is the recommended approach for preventing overflow issues.
Line range hint 559-589: Verify login form containment across browsers.
The login form styles look good, but let's verify the containment fix works across different browsers and screen sizes.
✅ Verification successful
Login form styles are properly contained with consistent box model across browsers
The verification shows:
- Global box-sizing is properly set to
border-boxfor all elements - No content-box overrides exist anywhere in the codebase
- Form inputs have consistent styling with:
- Explicit border definitions
- Standardized padding/margins
- Browser-specific appearance normalisation via
-webkit-appearance: none
- Login form specific styles are properly scoped under
.loginclass
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any potential overrides that might affect the box-sizing
rg -l "box-sizing:\s*content-box"
Length of output: 35
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for all box-sizing related styles to understand the containment
rg "box-sizing:" -A 2 -B 2
# Also check for browser-specific prefixes
rg "-webkit-box-sizing:|-moz-box-sizing:" -A 2 -B 2
# Check for any reset styles that might affect form elements
rg "input\[type|select|textarea" -A 3 -B 1
Length of output: 33443
theme-utils.mjs (6)
298-756: Excellent work on the comprehensive theme validation function!
The validateThemes function thoroughly checks theme directories against various WordPress requirements, including:
- Presence of required files like
style.css - Validity of
style.cssmetadata attributes - Compatibility of
theme.jsonwith the WordPress version - JSON schema validation for
theme.jsonand font files
It incorporates helpful utilities for:
- Reading and parsing JSON files
- Loading JSON schemas from different sources
- Creating detailed problem reports
- Generating user-friendly tabular output
The asynchronous implementation, error handling, and colourized progress tracking further enhance the function's robustness and usability.
767-793: LGTM! The createProblem factory function is well-structured.
It correctly extracts the theme name from the file path and supports overriding it via the options object. The data parameter is normalised into an array for consistent output.
The JSDoc annotations clearly document the function signature and return type.
795-821: The objectOwnPropertiesEntries helper function looks good.
It recursively traverses the prototype chain to include both enumerable and non-enumerable properties, while avoiding circular references by tracking visited objects.
The use of Set for efficient lookups and the array spread to convert the Set back to an array of key-value pairs is a nice touch.
882-958: The problemsToTable function is a bit complex but well-structured.
It dynamically calculates column widths based on the terminal size and content, with enforced minimum widths and padding. The use of spanning cells and formatting based on problem type results in a clear and informative table layout.
The logic for building the table data is split into distinct steps:
- Extract and format metadata rows
- Extract and format title rows
- Create data rows with type-specific formatting
- Merge rows into the final table data array
- Update column widths based on content
Breaking this down further into smaller functions could improve readability, but the inline comments already do a good job of explaining the overall structure.
960-986: Great job on the startProgress helper function!
It provides an elegant way to display a progress bar in the terminal when running in TTY mode, while gracefully degrading to a no-op in non-TTY environments.
The use of the string-progressbar library simplifies the rendering logic, and the cursor movement ensures smooth updates without flickering.
Returning an object with an increment method is a nice way to encapsulate the state and provide a clean interface for updating the progress.
275-275:
** The previous comment about incomplete string escaping is still valid.**
This line only replaces the first occurrence of a single quote, which may lead to unexpected behaviour if the input contains multiple single quotes.
To properly escape all single quotes, you can use a global regular expression with the g flag:
-const resultText = text.replace( "'", "\\'" ).trim();
+const resultText = text.replace( /'/g, "\\'" ).trim();🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 275-275: Incomplete string escaping or encoding
This replaces only the first occurrence of "'".
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| 20 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Specify the complete Node.js version number
Howzit! The version specified is quite broad, hey. While Node.js version 20 is correct, it would be lekker to specify the complete version number (20.10.0) to match your package.json requirements and ensure consistent development environments across the team.
Apply this change:
-20
+20.10.0📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| 20 | |
| 20.10.0 |
| node_modules | ||
| .sass-cache | ||
| .idea | ||
| *.sublime-workspace | ||
| package-lock.json | ||
| vendor | ||
| wp-content | ||
| package.json | ||
| .DS_Store | ||
| templates/.DS_Store | ||
| .DS_Store | ||
| assets/.DS_Store | ||
| .DS_Store | ||
| .DS_Store | ||
| .DS_Store | ||
| assets/css/.DS_Store | ||
| *.DS_Store | ||
| .vscode |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Reconsider removal of package management files
According to the AI summary, package.json and package-lock.json were removed from tracking. These files should be committed to the repository to:
- Ensure consistent dependency versions across the team
- Enable proper project setup for new developers
Apply this diff to restore package management:
node_modules
vendor
*.DS_Store
.vscode
+!package.json
+!package-lock.json📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| node_modules | |
| .sass-cache | |
| .idea | |
| *.sublime-workspace | |
| package-lock.json | |
| vendor | |
| wp-content | |
| package.json | |
| .DS_Store | |
| templates/.DS_Store | |
| .DS_Store | |
| assets/.DS_Store | |
| .DS_Store | |
| .DS_Store | |
| .DS_Store | |
| assets/css/.DS_Store | |
| *.DS_Store | |
| .vscode | |
| node_modules | |
| vendor | |
| *.DS_Store | |
| .vscode | |
| !package.json | |
| !package-lock.json |
| { | ||
| "extends": "stylelint-config-recommended" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider using WordPress-specific stylelint configuration, my china!
Howzit! While the stylelint-config-recommended is a lekker starting point, for a WordPress theme you might want to use the @wordpress/stylelint-config instead. This will ensure your CSS follows WordPress coding standards.
Additionally, consider adding these rules to make your config more kiff:
{
- "extends": "stylelint-config-recommended"
+ "extends": "@wordpress/stylelint-config",
+ "rules": {
+ "no-descending-specificity": null,
+ "selector-class-pattern": null,
+ "max-line-length": 120,
+ "declaration-property-unit-allowed-list": {
+ "line-height": []
+ }
+ }
}These rules will:
- Disable some overly strict rules that often cause kak with WordPress themes
- Add a sensible line length limit
- Ensure consistent units are used
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| { | |
| "extends": "stylelint-config-recommended" | |
| } | |
| { | |
| "extends": "@wordpress/stylelint-config", | |
| "rules": { | |
| "no-descending-specificity": null, | |
| "selector-class-pattern": null, | |
| "max-line-length": 120, | |
| "declaration-property-unit-allowed-list": { | |
| "line-height": [] | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
| "path": "../../.." | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "settings": {} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yoh! Add recommended VS Code settings for web development.
The empty settings object misses an opportunity to enforce consistent development practices. Consider adding common settings for web development:
- "settings": {}
+ "settings": {
+ "editor.defaultFormatter": "esbenp.prettier-vscode",
+ "editor.formatOnSave": true,
+ "editor.codeActionsOnSave": {
+ "source.fixAll.stylelint": true,
+ "source.fixAll.eslint": true
+ },
+ "files.associations": {
+ "*.css": "css",
+ "*.scss": "scss"
+ }
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "settings": {} | |
| "settings": { | |
| "editor.defaultFormatter": "esbenp.prettier-vscode", | |
| "editor.formatOnSave": true, | |
| "editor.codeActionsOnSave": { | |
| "source.fixAll.stylelint": true, | |
| "source.fixAll.eslint": true | |
| }, | |
| "files.associations": { | |
| "*.css": "css", | |
| "*.scss": "scss" | |
| } | |
| } |
| { | ||
| "path": "../../.." | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Howzit! That workspace path needs a proper fix, my bru.
Looking at the repository structure, there's no need to point three directories up since the workspace file is already at the root. Rather use "." to reference the current directory.
Here's what's wrong:
- The current path "../../.." points outside your project structure
- The workspace file is already at the root level, making the up-level navigation unnecessary
- Empty settings object could use some project-specific configurations
Quick fix: Change the path from "../../.." to "." to keep everything lekker and properly referenced.
🔗 Analysis chain
Eish! The relative path might cause kak workspace loading.
The path "../../.." points three directories up, which could lead to inconsistent workspace loading on different machines. Consider using a workspace-relative path instead.
Let's check the repository structure to suggest a better path:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check repository structure to determine appropriate workspace path
echo "Repository structure from root:"
tree -L 3 -d
Length of output: 138
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different commands to understand the workspace structure
# Find the location of the workspace file
echo "Location of workspace file:"
fd -t f "lsx-design.code-workspace"
# Check the content of the workspace file
echo -e "\nWorkspace file content:"
cat $(fd -t f "lsx-design.code-workspace")
# List directories from root to understand structure
echo -e "\nList directories from root:"
ls -R | grep ":$" | sed -e 's/:$//' -e 's/[^-][^\/]*\// /g' -e 's/^/ /'
# Find any package.json files that might help understand project structure
echo -e "\nPackage.json locations:"
fd -t f "package.json"
Length of output: 1001
| "engines": { | ||
| "node": ">=20.10.0", | ||
| "npm": ">=10.2.3" | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Review Node.js version requirement
The specified Node.js version (>=20.10.0) is quite recent. Consider supporting LTS versions to ensure broader compatibility.
Consider adjusting to:
- "node": ">=20.10.0",
+ "node": ">=18.0.0",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "engines": { | |
| "node": ">=20.10.0", | |
| "npm": ">=10.2.3" | |
| }, | |
| "engines": { | |
| "node": ">=18.0.0", | |
| "npm": ">=10.2.3" | |
| }, |
| "scripts": { | ||
| "lint:css": "stylelint **/*.css -i .gitignore", | ||
| "lint:css:fix": "stylelint **/*.css -i .gitignore --fix", | ||
| "lint:php": "composer run-script lint", | ||
| "lint:php:fix": "composer run-script format", | ||
| "lint:theme": "node theme-utils.mjs validate-theme", | ||
| "lint:patterns:fix": "node theme-utils.mjs escape-patterns --text-domain=twentytwentyfive" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review script configuration
The new lint scripts are well-structured, but there's a potential issue:
- The patterns fix script references "twentytwentyfive" which seems incorrect for this theme
- There's a duplicate
scriptssection in the JSON (one at line 23)
Apply this fix:
- "lint:patterns:fix": "node theme-utils.mjs escape-patterns --text-domain=twentytwentyfive"
+ "lint:patterns:fix": "node theme-utils.mjs escape-patterns --text-domain=lsxd"Also, merge the two scripts sections to avoid potential conflicts.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| "version": "1.5.0", | ||
| "private": false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Version bump appears inconsistent with changes
The version bump from 1.4.0 to 1.5.0 (minor version increase) seems disproportionate to the actual changes. The git history shows only a login form CSS modification (assets/css/blocks/loginout.css), which would typically warrant a patch version bump (1.4.1) rather than a minor version increase according to semantic versioning principles.
- The most recent commit mentions "Updating the changelog and the version numbers" but the changes appear to be limited to login form styling
- No significant feature additions or breaking changes are evident in the diff
- Consider using 1.4.1 instead of 1.5.0 to better reflect the scope of changes
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify version bump and metadata updates
The version has been bumped to 1.5.0, but this seems unrelated to the login form fix mentioned in the PR objectives. Additionally, the repository URLs and metadata have been updated to reflect the new repository name.
Also applies to: 9-9, 12-15, 16-16, 18-18, 20-20
Let me analyze the changes to determine if the version bump is justified based on the actual code changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if version bump follows semantic versioning based on changes
# Test: Look for significant changes that warrant a minor version bump
rg -g '!package*.json' -g '!composer.json' -l 'version|Version'
Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check git history for changes between versions
git log --oneline | grep -i "version"
# Look for changelog entries
fd "CHANGELOG" --type f --exec cat {}
# Check for major feature additions or breaking changes
git diff HEAD~1 --name-only
Length of output: 7894
| Stable tag: 1.4.0 | ||
| License: GPLv3 | ||
| Licence URI: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.en.html | ||
|
|
||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Extra empty line spotted.
Howzit! There's an additional empty line here that seems unnecessary. While it doesn't affect functionality, removing it would maintain consistent spacing in the file.
| /** | ||
| * Converts an object into a borderless table format. | ||
| * | ||
| * Example: | ||
| * objectToTable( { | ||
| * keyOne: 'value1', | ||
| * keyTwo: 'value2', | ||
| * keyThree: 3, | ||
| * fn: () => {}, | ||
| * obj: {}, | ||
| * } ) | ||
| * // Returns: | ||
| * // 'key one : value1\n' + | ||
| * // 'key two : value2\n' + | ||
| * // 'key three : 3' | ||
| * | ||
| * @param {Object} obj Object to convert into a table | ||
| * @param {Object} [extraOptions] Extra options for the table | ||
| * | ||
| * @return {string} Table string | ||
| */ | ||
| function objectToTable( obj = {}, extraOptions ) { | ||
| const data = objectOwnPropertiesEntries( obj ) | ||
| .filter( | ||
| ( [ key, value ] ) => | ||
| typeof value !== 'function' && ! key.startsWith( '_' ) | ||
| ) | ||
| .map( ( [ key, value ] ) => [ | ||
| key | ||
| .split( /(?=[A-Z0-9])/g ) | ||
| .map( ( part, i ) => | ||
| i === 0 | ||
| ? part.charAt( 0 ).toUpperCase() + part.slice( 1 ) | ||
| : part.charAt( 0 ).toLowerCase() + part.slice( 1 ) | ||
| ) | ||
| .join( ' ' ), | ||
| typeof value === 'object' | ||
| ? util.inspect( value, { colors: chalk.level > 0 } ) | ||
| : value, | ||
| ] ); | ||
|
|
||
| const options = { | ||
| columns: [ { paddingLeft: 0 }, { paddingRight: 0 } ], | ||
| border: getBorderCharacters( 'void' ), // No border, modified below. | ||
| drawHorizontalLine: () => false, | ||
| }; | ||
| options.border.bodyJoin = ':'; | ||
|
|
||
| // Hack for alignment with other tables. | ||
| if ( extraOptions?.columns?.[ 0 ]?.minWidth ) { | ||
| options.columns[ 0 ].width = Math.max( | ||
| extraOptions.columns[ 0 ].minWidth, | ||
| ...data.map( ( [ key ] ) => key.length ) | ||
| ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return table( data, options ).slice( 0, -1 ); // Remove trailing newline. | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Clever approach to converting an object to a borderless table format!
The function handles various value types, splits camel case keys into separate words, and applies sensible filtering and formatting.
Integrating with the table library and supporting extra options for column alignment makes it quite versatile.
Consider adding a few more inline comments to explain the key steps and transformations for enhanced maintainability.
This PR addresses issue #212 by applying
box-sizing: border-box;to the login form inputs. This change ensures that padding and borders are included within the element's total width and height, preventing the inputs from overflowing the form container.Changes Made:
Updated the CSS for form#loginform input to include
box-sizing: border-box;.Testing:
Verified that the login form inputs are properly contained within the form container on various browsers and screen sizes.
By implementing this fix, the login form's appearance will be consistent and visually aligned, enhancing the user experience.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes
.DS_Storefiles for better project cleanliness.Documentation