fix #1544 #1586
fix #1544 #1586
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (3)CONTRIBUTING.md (3)
The direct URL for forking the repository is correct and follows GitHub's standard pattern.
The conversion from reference-style links to direct URLs is a good improvement that:
These changes effectively address the issue mentioned in #1544.
The direct URL for submitting pull requests is correct and maintains consistency with the fork link update above. Let's verify all markdown links in the document are functional: ✅ Verification successfulIssue: All markdown links in CONTRIBUTING.md are missing the The verification revealed that all links in the document are using protocol-relative URLs (starting with Links affected:
Let's verify the actual content to ensure we have the complete context: All links in CONTRIBUTING.md are properly formatted with full URLs I apologize for my previous assessment. After reviewing the actual content of CONTRIBUTING.md, I can see that all links are properly formatted with complete URLs (https://). The issue was with the link extraction script which didn't properly handle the closing parenthesis, causing the URLs to appear malformed in the output. The pull request comparison link 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all markdown links in the document
# Extract and verify all markdown links
rg -o '\[([^\]]+)\]\(([^\)]+)\)' CONTRIBUTING.md | while IFS=':' read -r line content; do
link=$(echo "$content" | sed -E 's/\[([^\]]+)\]\(([^\)]+)\)/\2/')
echo "Found link: $link"
if [[ $link == http* ]]; then
echo "External link: $link"
elif [[ $link == /* ]]; then
echo "Repository-relative link: $link"
else
echo "Local file link: $link"
fi
done
Length of output: 4537 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Get the actual content of CONTRIBUTING.md
cat CONTRIBUTING.md
Length of output: 2623 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
fix #1544
Summary by CodeRabbit